Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
The Editors of Open Biology would like to thank all reviewers who contributed their time by refereeing manuscripts submitted throughout 2023. From previous feedback, we know that most reviewers value recognition of their efforts by the journal and through services, such as Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Science, which is integrated with Open Biology.
Under our scheme to reward peer review (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsob/reviewer-rewards), reviewers of Open Biology will be awarded tokens that can be redeemed against article processing charges (APCs) when they publish with us.
To further provide opportunities for recognition, we list the names of all reviewers who opted in. This article is made permanent and citeable by its digital object identifier (DOI). We encourage you to quote your contribution in your applications for tenure and grants or other forms of research assessment. Where you have provided it, we have included your ORCID, so your contribution can be unambiguously assigned to you.
The team really does appreciate all the work our reviewers do on behalf of the journal, and we look forward to working with you again in future.