Detailed causality between coronavirus disease‐2019 and atrial fibrillation
Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
To the Editor,
Niu et al. investigated the clinical implication of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19).1 According to their findings, AF was prevalent in patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 and was associated with worse in‐hospital mortality, more disease‐related complication, and increased healthcare utilization. Several concerns have been raised.
COVID‐19 is a systemic inflammatory disease that induces various cardiovascular conditions.2 AF may be triggered by this inflammatory cascade. Consequently, the presence of AF may be a confounding factor for in‐hospital mortality rather than a prognostic factor. Did the authors observe obvious differences in the severity and inflammatory status of COVID‐19 between those with and without AF?
It is widely acknowledged that AF is a robust predictor of cardiovascular diseases and mortality.3 Did the authors identify any distinct profiles in individuals who had both COVID‐19 and AF when compared to those with AF alone?
In the authors' study, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia was higher in individuals with AF.1 However, the detailed types of ventricular arrhythmia remain uncertain. For instance, did the authors include premature ventricular contractions? It is plausible that the dominant causes of in‐hospital cardiac arrest were ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation is often encountered in younger patients with acute coronary syndrome, while extra‐cardiac abnormalities such as anemia and advanced age are associated with pulseless electrical activity.4 Could the authors provide more clarity on the relationship between COVID‐19, AF, and cardiac arrest?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Niu H , Li J , Teng C , et al. The incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation on hospitalized coronavirus disease‐2019 patients. Clin Cardiol. 2024;47(2):e 24240.38402574 10.1002/clc.24240 PMC 10894524 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Nishiga M , Wang DW , Han Y , Lewis DB , Wu JC . COVID‐19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(9):543‐558.32690910 10.1038/s 41569-020-0413-9PMC 7370876 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Odutayo A , Wong CX , Hsiao AJ , Hopewell S , Altman DG , Emdin CA . Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i 4482.27599725 10.1136/bmj.i 4482 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Holmstrom L , Bednarski B , Chugh H , et al. Artificial intelligence model predicts sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation. Circ Arrhyth Electrophysiol. 2024;17(2):e 012338.10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012338 PMC 1087616638284289 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
