# Impact of an Educational Measure on the Quality of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Pre-post Interventional Study

**Authors:** Aashish Chaudhary, Gaurav Singh, Abhishek Hooda, Jyoti Garg, Divya Saharan, Surendra Kumar, Karnika Agrawal, Nazir A Pandit

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54721 · Cureus · 2024-02-22

## TL;DR

This study shows that a simple educational intervention significantly improves the accuracy of death certificates at a teaching hospital.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that targeted education reduces major and minor errors in death certificate documentation.

## Key findings

- Pre-intervention, 88% of certificates had at least one major error, reduced to 33% post-intervention.
- Minor errors dropped from 92.93% to 38% after the educational intervention.
- All error reductions were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

## Abstract

Background

A death certificate is an important document that serves as a tool for gathering epidemiological data and as an essential legal document. Although it is a mandatory document to be given for all deaths, the quality of its filling is often an ignored aspect and errors are frequently encountered. This documentation process can be mastered with minimal educational efforts. This study aimed to determine the utility of an educational measure in improving the accuracy of death certificate documentation.

Methods and materials

This pre- and post-interventional study was conducted at Maharaja Agrasen Medical College, Agroha, a tertiary care teaching hospital in Hisar, Haryana, India, wherein an audit of death certificates was done before and after an educational intervention on doctors responsible for filling death certificates. Errors in the death certificates were classified into major and minor errors and compared in the pre- and post-intervention groups.

Results

A total of 184 pre-intervention and 136 post-intervention death certificates were audited. In the pre-intervention certificates, at least one major and one minor error were present in 88% and 92.93% of the certificates, respectively, which was reduced to 33% (p < 0.01; relative risk (RR) = 3.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.69-4.91) and 38% (p < 0.01; RR = 3.33; 95% CI = 2.53-4.37), respectively, post-intervention. Reduction in all types of major and minor errors was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Errors in death certification are a common but frequently ignored problem that can have a negative impact on epidemiological data and can be drastically reduced with simple educational measures, which need to be carried out regularly.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Death (MESH:D003643)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10961142/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10961142/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10961142/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10961142