# Where experience makes a difference: teachers’ judgment accuracy and diagnostic reasoning regarding student learning characteristics

**Authors:** Christian Kosel, Elisabeth Bauer, Tina Seidel

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1278472 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2024-03-07

## TL;DR

Experienced teachers are better at judging student learning characteristics than novices, due to their more comprehensive diagnostic reasoning.

## Contribution

The study shows that experienced teachers make more accurate judgments and connect a broader range of cues when diagnosing student profiles.

## Key findings

- Experienced teachers had higher judgment accuracy in diagnosing student profiles compared to novice teachers.
- Experienced teachers connected a broader spectrum of surface and deep cues in their diagnostic reasoning.
- The findings suggest that professional experience enhances teachers' diagnostic skills and informs teacher training strategies.

## Abstract

The concept of teacher professional vision suggests that experienced teachers, compared to novice teachers, might be better at making accurate judgments of students’ learning characteristics, which can be explained by their advanced reasoning in diagnostic situations. This study examines experienced and novice teachers’ diagnoses of different student characteristic profiles: three inconsistent profiles (overestimating, uninterested, and underestimating) and two consistent profiles (strong and struggling). We examined both experienced (n = 19 in-service mathematics teachers) and novice teachers (n = 24 pre-service mathematics teachers) to determine the extent of differences in their judgment accuracy and their diagnostic reasoning about observable cues when diagnosing student profiles while watching a lesson video. ANOVA results indicate that experienced teachers generally achieved a higher judgment accuracy in diagnosing student profiles compared to novice teachers. Moreover, epistemic network analysis of observable cues in experienced and novice teachers’ diagnostic reasoning showed that, compared to novice teachers, experienced teachers make more relations between a broader spectrum of both surface cues (e.g., a student’s hand-raising behavior) and deep cues (e.g., a student being interested in the subject). Experienced teachers thereby construct more comprehensive and robust reasoning compared to novice teachers. The findings highlight how professional experience shapes teachers’ professional skills, such as diagnosing, and suggest strategies for enhancing teacher training.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), disruptive behavior (MESH:D019958), mental disorders (MESH:D001523), learning difficulties in (MESH:D007859)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10956699/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10956699/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10956699/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10956699