# Bibliometric analysis and key messages of integrating Chinese and Western Medicine for COVID-19

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes global research on integrating Chinese and Western medicine for treating and preventing COVID-19, highlighting differences and common trends in research focus and development.

## Contribution

The study provides a comparative bibliometric analysis of Chinese and English literature on integrated medicine for COVID-19, revealing research trends and key contributions.

## Key findings

- Chinese literature emphasizes clinical studies of ICWM for COVID-19, including syndrome analysis and clinical features.
- English literature focuses on therapeutic mechanisms and evidence-based medicine, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
- Both Chinese and English research highlight network pharmacology and the use of Qingfei Paidu Decoction.

## Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a global pandemic since it broke out, and integrated Chinese and Western medicine (ICWM) has played an important role in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. We aimed to analyze the published literature on ICWM for COVID-19 at home and abroad, and compare their differences on hotspots and research fronts.

Publications before Oct 31, 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science core database (WOS), PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), CiteSpace and VOSviewer to summarize the basic characteristics of publications, countries, institutions, keywords, and citations.

We included 580 English papers and 1727 Chinese papers in this study. The development trends in China and other countries are relatively asynchronous and show a smooth growth trend for the future. The most productive countries were China, India, and the United States, while the most productive domestic research institution was the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. The clustering analysis of high-frequency keywords showed that Chinese literature focused on clinical studies of ICWM for COVID-19, such as retrospective studies, clinical features, and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome analysis, while English literature focused on therapeutic mechanism studies and evidence-based medicine studies, such as systematic reviews and meta-analysis, and both of them paid attention to network pharmacological research and Qingfei Paidu Decoction. Sorting out the top 10 highly cited articles, Huang CL's article published in Lancet in 2020 was regarded as a cornerstone in the field.

The treatment of COVID-19 by ICWM has become a worldwide research hotspot. Although there are differences in the specific contents among countries, the development trend of research types to the mechanism of action, and the development trend of research contents to the recovery period treatment and the prevention of COVID-19 by ICWM are consistent.