# Leveraging qualitative approaches to guide sustainable international research collaborations

**Authors:** Roxanne Vandermause, Rachel Kryah, Julie Bertram, Hannah L. Stewart, Nil Ean, Steven Bruce, Adam W. Carrico, Julie A. Mannarino, Robert H. Paul

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002941 · PLOS Global Public Health · 2024-03-19

## TL;DR

This paper describes how qualitative research methods helped build a sustainable international collaboration between U.S. and Cambodian mental health professionals.

## Contribution

The paper introduces using qualitative approaches early in international collaborations to foster mutual understanding and sustainability.

## Key findings

- Cambodian psychiatrists gained competence in qualitative methods after observing and participating in focus groups.
- U.S. and Cambodian teams developed a deeper understanding of each other's mental health care challenges.
- Qualitative methods facilitated cross-cultural relationships and helped overcome anticipated and unexpected challenges.

## Abstract

Qualitative research approaches were used to launch an international research collaboration between the U. S. and Cambodia. Cambodian officials requested assistance in learning qualitative approaches to complement the research skills of Cambodian mental health providers. This article provides a description of how U. S. researchers responded to that request and engaged with Cambodian psychiatrists to explore mental health needs and interventions in both countries and initiate a sustainable relationship. The early focus on qualitative research methodologies may be an avenue that mitigates some of the challenges that can characterize international research. In this study, early communications involved developing a plan to teach qualitative methods while also collecting and analyzing data in both countries that would address the mental health concerns experienced by respective care providers. A case study exemplar was embedded with a scripted focus group guide to collect data from U. S. focus groups, then share with Cambodian psychiatrists. Components of hermeneutic phenomenological interviewing and descriptive content analysis were used to simultaneously teach and enact the research methods, gather data in both countries to analyze, and inspire participants to replicate the methods in their ongoing work. Cambodian psychiatrists were able to demonstrate competence in facilitating focus groups after being participant-observers. Researcher/practitioners from both U. S. and Cambodian teams gained new understandings about the mental health needs of their patients. The mutual engagement of a research focus is an effective way to establish cross-cultural relationships. The challenges of staying with stable teams over times remain, but the content shared and learned in a participatory structure yields understandings that cross cultural boundaries. Anticipated and unexpected challenges may be offset by an intention of reciprocity and mutual engagement. The use of qualitative methodologies, early and repeatedly, can facilitate relational understanding.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10950217/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10950217/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10950217/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10950217