# Impact of melphalan day -1 vs day -2 on outcomes after autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma

**Authors:** Aimee Merino, Ryan Shanley, Faridullah Rashid, Jenna Langer, Michelle Dolan, Sarah Tu, Najla El Jurdi, John Rogosheske, Kirollos Hanna, Todd DeFor, Murali Janakiram, Daniel Weisdorf

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1310752 · Frontiers in Immunology · 2024-03-05

## TL;DR

This study compares giving melphalan one or two days before a stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma and finds similar outcomes in terms of recovery and survival.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that melphalan can be safely administered either one or two days before transplant without significant differences in key outcomes.

## Key findings

- Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was similar between D-1 and D-2 melphalan groups.
- Two-year progression-free and overall survival rates were comparable in both dosing schedules.
- Hospital readmission within 30 days was higher in the D-1 group after adjusting for other factors.

## Abstract

Melphalan is the most common conditioning regimen used prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT); however, there are varying data on optimal melphalan timing prior to transplant for best safety and efficacy. Historically, ASCT conditioning consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m2 on day 2 (D-2) (48 h prior to ASCT), but many institutions have since adopted a melphalan protocol with administration on day 1 (D-1) (24 h prior to SCT) or split dosing over the 2 days. The optimal timing of melphalan has yet to be determined.

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed transplant outcomes for patients between March 2011 and September 2020 admitted for high-dose, single-agent melphalan 200 mg/m2 on D-1 vs. D-2. The primary outcomes were time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Secondary outcomes include incidence of hospital readmission within 30 days, 2-year progression-free survival, and 2-year overall survival.

A total of 366 patients were studied (D-2 n = 269 and D-1 n = 97). The incidence of high-risk cytogenetics was similar between the two groups (37% vs. 40%). Median days to absolute neutrophil count engraftment was similar at 11 days in the D-2 and D-1 cohort (n = 269, range 0–14, IQR 11–11 vs. n = 97, range 0–14, IQR 11–12). Median days to platelet engraftment >20,000/mcL was 18 days for D-2 melphalan (range: 0–28, IQR 17–20) versus 19 days for D-1 melphalan (range: 0–32, IQR 17–21). Overall survival at 2 years post-transplant was similar in both cohorts (94%; p = 0.76), and PFS was 70% in D-2 compared with 78% in D-1 (p = 0.15). In a multivariable model including age and performance status, hospital readmission within 30 days of transplant was higher in the D-1 cohort (odds ratio 1.9; p = 0.01).

This study demonstrates similar neutrophil and platelet engraftment in D-1 and D-2 melphalan cohorts with similar 2-year PFS and OS. Either D-2 or D-1 melphalan dosing schedule is safe and effective.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** melphalan (PubChem CID 460612)
- **Diseases:** multiple myeloma (MONDO:0009693)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** multiple myeloma (MESH:D009101)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948501/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948501/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948501/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948501