# Evaluation of a Course to Teach Medical Students Latent Hazard Identification in the Operating Room

**Authors:** Natasha C Cammer, Kristen M Mascarenhas, Marianfeli C Delgado-Landino, Danielle B Horn, Roxanna J Araya, Richard H Epstein, Jean R Corvington, Catherine P Marudo, Alecia L Stein, Joni M Maga

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56367 · Cureus · 2024-03-18

## TL;DR

A virtual online course helped medical students identify more hidden dangers in operating rooms compared to traditional classroom training.

## Contribution

A virtual online operating room training improved hazard identification in real OR simulations.

## Key findings

- Students using the virtual environment identified 41.3% of hazards, significantly more than the control group.
- There was no difference in misidentifying non-hazards between the groups.
- The virtual approach is recommended as a resource-efficient alternative to in-person training.

## Abstract

Introduction: To improve situational awareness in the operating room (OR), a virtual online operating room of hazards (ROH) with deliberately placed risks was created. We hypothesized that subjects first participating in the virtual online ROH would identify more hazards during an in-person ROH exercise in a physical OR than those in the control group who only received didactic training.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at a major academic medical center, enrolling 48 pre-clinical medical students with no previous OR exposure during their classes. Control and experimental group subjects participated in a brief, online didactic orientation session conducted live over Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, CA) to learn about latent hazards in the OR. Experimental group subjects further interacted with a virtual online operating ROH in which latent hazards were present. The fraction of deliberately created latent hazards placed in a physical, in-person OR identified by subjects was calculated.

Results: Experimental group subjects identified a significantly larger fraction of the created hazards (41.3%) than the control group (difference = 16.4%, 95% CI: 11.3% to 21.4%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the number of non-hazards misidentified as hazards between the groups.

Conclusions: Participation in the virtual online environment resulted in greater recognition of latent operating room hazards during a simulation conducted in a physical, in-person OR than in a didactic experience alone. Because creating an in-room experience to teach the identification of latent hazards in an OR is resource-intensive and requires removing the OR from clinical use, we recommend the virtual online approach described for training purposes. Adding items most misidentified as hazards is suggested for future implementation.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fatigue (MESH:D005221), head (MESH:D006258)
- **Chemicals:** ROH (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948080/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948080/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948080/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10948080