Chronotype of pregnant women with diabetes mellitus: what is the relationship with maternal and fetal outcomes?
Johnnatas Lopes, Julio Martinez Santos, Guilherme Ribeiro, Matheus Queiroz, Jorge Fernando Pereira Silva

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBirth, Development, and Health · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Fatty Acid Research and Health
DEAR EDITOR
Gestational diabetes seems to be related to the modified circadian rhythm in this period (1). However, further clarification is needed with covariance adjustments for the variables involved and longitudinal design. Facanha and cols. (2) proposed a research strategy in order to answer some questions of scientific interest, such as the relationship between morningness/eveningness chronotypes on maternal and fetal outcomes. However, we identified gaps that could be better clarified by the authors in measuring these relationships.
In the study, Tables 1 to 3 report the differences between pregnant with diabetes mellitus in terms of different factors depending on the morningness/eveningness chronotype. In maternal outcomes, a difference was identified in pre-eclampsia and in neonatal patients in intensive care and, marginally, in prematurity. This information only tells us that there is a difference between the groups and that it does not exclude the need to test the relationship of maternal factors with their outcomes and also fetal outcomes in regression models (3).
However, Facanha and cols. (2) presented only the unadjusted model for some factors, apparently those that revealed differences between chronotypes, when in fact they should be the factors theoretically related to the outcome of pre-eclampsia, such as demographic and clinical variables and comorbidities. These regressions go beyond differences between groups, it allows for control of covariance in the raw model (3).
In addition, there is a mistake in the selection of independent variables in the model presented for the pre-eclampsia outcome. The age variable included in the adjusted model should not be used because it did not reach the minimum criterion of p < 0.20 in the crude analysis. This can interfere with the quality and usefulness of the model. It would also be of great value to develop the model for neonatal outcomes.
Therefore, we understand as relevant the construction of a hierarchical model for neonatal outcomes and a better exploration of the independent variables in the elaboration of the model, the outcome such as pre-eclampsia in order to exclude or not the relation with the chronotype of the pregnant woman with diabetes mellitus.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Weschenfelder F Lohse K Lehmann T Schleußner E Groten T Circadian rhythm and gestational diabetes: working conditions, sleeping habits and lifestyle influence insulin dependency during pregnancy Acta Diabetol 2021095891177118610.1007/s 00592-021-01708-833837820 PMC 8316165 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Facanha CFS Alencar VS Machado PS Macêdo RBL de Bruin PFC Costa E Morningness/eveningness in gestational diabetes mellitus: clinical characteristics and maternal-neonatal outcomes Arch Endocrinol Metab 202301186719210010.20945/2359-399700000051536155121 PMC 9983797 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Suárez E Pérez CM Rivera R Martínez MN Poisson Regression Models for Cohort Studies In Applications of Regression Models in Epidemiology 2017 Available from: 10.1002/9781119212515.ch 10 · doi ↗
