# Resources needed by critical access hospitals to address identified infection prevention and control program gaps

**Authors:** Mounica Soma, Jody Scebold, Angela Vasa, Teresa Ann Fitzgerald, Kate Tyner, Satya Kumar Lalam, Sue Beach, Muhammad Salman Ashraf

PMC · DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.32 · Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology : ASHE · 2024-03-15

## TL;DR

This study identifies infection prevention and control gaps in small hospitals and highlights the resources needed to address them.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into specific IPC program gaps and resource needs in Critical Access Hospitals.

## Key findings

- The top IPC gaps include missing drug diversion programs and audit tools for catheter care.
- Standardized audit tools and staff training materials are most needed to improve IPC practices.
- No significant difference in IPC scores was found between hospitals in Nebraska and Iowa.

## Abstract

The study examined resources needed by Infection Preventionists (IP) to address infection prevention and control (IPC) program gaps.

A 49-question survey.

Licensed Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) in Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) Region VII.

IP at licensed CAHs.

The survey conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 consisted of questions focusing on four categories including IPC program infrastructure, competency-based training, audit and feedback, and identification of high-risk pathogens/serious communicable diseases (HRP/SCD). An IPC score was calculated for each facility by totaling “Yes” responses (which indicate best practices) to 49 main survey questions. Follow-up questions explored the resources needed by the CAHs to implement or further strengthen best practices and mitigate IPC practice gaps. Welch t-test was used to study differences in IPC practice scores between states.

50 of 259 (19.3%) CAHs participated in the survey with 37 (14.3%) answering all 49 questions. CAHs responding to all questions had a median IPC score of 35. There was no significant difference between IPC practice scores of CAHs in NE and IA. The top three IPC gaps were absence of drug diversion program (77%), lack of audits and feedback for insertion and maintenance of central venous catheters (76%), and missing laboratory risk assessments to identify tests that can be offered safely for patients under investigation for HRP/SCD (76%). Standardized audit tools, educational resources, and staff training materials were cited as much-needed resources.

IPC practice gaps exist in CAHs. Various resources are needed for gap mitigation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** tuberculosis (MONDO:0018076)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Infection (MESH:D007239), SCD (MESH:C536778), serious communicable diseases (MESH:D003141)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10945943/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10945943/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10945943/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10945943