# Establishing research impact assessment in Iran: The first report from a non-high-income country

**Authors:** Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Ayat Ahmadi, Farid Najafi, Kazem Mohammad, Mohammad Fariden, Davood Khalili, Mahdi Mahdavi, Elaheh Rahimpour, Abolghasem Jouyban, Roya Kelishadi, Mohammad Reza Monazzam, Monir Baradaran Eftekhari, Katayoun Falahat, Sima Nikooee, Reza Majdzadeh

PMC · DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04050 · Journal of Global Health · 2024-03-15

## TL;DR

This paper introduces the first research impact assessment in a non-high-income country, Iran, using a case study approach to evaluate health research outcomes.

## Contribution

The study pioneers the use of the 'payback' model for health research impact assessment in a non-high-income country.

## Key findings

- Only 25% of assessed health research projects achieved impact in at least one domain.
- Technology-focused research showed the highest acceptance rate of claimed impact.
- Economic impact was verified in only three projects, highlighting a need for improvement.

## Abstract

This study presents the first report on research impact assessment (RIA) in non-high-income countries, undertaken as a pilot initiative in 2021. Within it, we aimed to explore the feasibility of employing the ‘payback’ model for evaluating the impact of health research and enhancing the accountability of universities. We focussed on three key impact domains: ‘production of decision support documents and knowledge-based products,’ ‘implementation of research results,’ and ‘health and economic impact.’

We adopted a case study approach to assess the impact of 5334 health research projects conducted by researchers from 18 universities from 2018 to 2020. Researchers were required to submit evidence related to at least one of the specified impact domains; six scientific committees verified and scored claimed impacts at the national level.

Only 25% of the assessed projects achieved impact in at least one domain, with the production of decision support documents and knowledge products being the most reported impact. Notably, economic impact was verified in only three projects, indicating room for improvement in this area. Technology research exhibited the highest acceptance rate of claimed impact, suggesting a positive correlation between technology-focused projects and impactful outcomes.

This study demonstrates the feasibility of employing a case study approach and the ‘payback’ model to evaluate the impact of health research, even within the constraints of a moderately equipped research infrastructure. These findings underscore the potential of integrating RIA into the governance of health research in Iran and other non-high-income countries, as well as the importance of using RIA to assess the accountability of health research systems, guide the allocation of research funding, and advocate for the advancement of health research. The study sets a precedent for future assessments in similar contexts and contributes to the ongoing global dialogue on the societal impact of health research.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** urinary tract infection (MESH:D014552), cancer (MESH:D009369), thalassemia major (MESH:D017086), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10939117/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10939117/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10939117/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10939117