Commentary: Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on bone mineral density: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Jiahao Chen, Xiang Guo, Hong Song

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGut microbiota and health · Genetic Associations and Epidemiology · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Introduction
1
Shuai Chen and his colleagues published a study titled “Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on bone mineral density: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study” in Frontiers in Endocrinology (1). The authors concluded, “Our MR analysis also found that the abundance of Prevotella9 and Prevotellaceae was associated with high BMD at different sites. Consistent directional effects for all analyses were observed in both MR-Egger and weighted median methods, which suggests that Prevotella might be a promising target for osteoporosis prevention.” We support and appreciate the authors’ work and agree with their conclusions. However, we have some concerns about their data and results. Here are some critical comments on these issues.
On the first line of Supplementary Table S1, the Effect allele and Other alleles were marked wrong. In the article of Qi Wang et al. (2–4), the Effect_allele of rs182549 was C, and Other_allele was T, while in the author’s article, the Effect_allele of rs182549 was T, and Other_allele was C. In short, “Effect_allele” and “Other_allele” should switch places in the Supplementary Table S1.
Under the subheading of Causal effect of the gut microbiota on forearm bone mineral density, this article first describes “Genus Prevotella9 (β = 0.129, 95% CI: 0.007–0.251, P = 0.039) were negatively associated with FA-BMD (Figure 2)”. Then, in Discussion, this article describes “which suggests that Prevotella might be a promising target for osteoporosis prevention.” There is an apparent inconsistency between the two accounts. β is the beta value, and exposure factors and outcomes are positively correlated when β is >0 (5–7). Hence, Prevotella9 was positively correlated with FA-BMD, which is consistent with the study of Liang Zhuang et al., “Some short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) producers, including Lactobacillus, Akkermansia, Prevotella, Alistipes, and Butyricicoccus, were reduced in patients with lower bone mass (LBM) and PMO.” (8).
The study by Chen and his colleagues has helped us better understand the relationship between specific gut microbiota and bone mineral density. Still, it needs to be written more accurately to demonstrate the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and the risk of osteoporosis.
Author contributions
JC: Writing – original draft, Investigation. XG: Investigation, Writing – original draft. HS: Writing – review & editing.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Chen S Zhou G Han H Jin J Li Z. Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on bone mineral density: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol. (2023) 14:1178831. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1178831 PMC 1046155737645419 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Wang Q Dai H Hou T Hou Y Wang T Lin H. Dissecting causal relationships between gut microbiota, blood metabolites, and stroke: A mendelian randomization study. J Stroke. (2023) 25:350–60. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.00381 PMC 1057429737813672 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Xie L Zhao H Chen W. Relationship between gut microbiota and thyroid function: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol. (2023) 14:1240752. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1240752 PMC 1056273537822602 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Xu Q Ni JJ Han BX Yan SS Wei XT Feng GJ. Causal relationship between gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases: A two-sample mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol. (2022) 12:746998. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.746998 35140703 PMC 8819003 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Huang D Lin S He J Wang Q Zhan Y. Association between COVID-19 and telomere length: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. J Med Virol. (2022) 94:5345–53. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28008 PMC 934976735854470 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Rosoff DB Bell AS Jung J Wagner J Mavromatis LA Lohoff FW. Mendelian randomization study of PCSK 9 and HMG-Co A reductase inhibition and cognitive function. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 80:653–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.041.35953131 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Chen X Kong J Pan J Huang K Zhou W Diao X. Kidney damage causally affects the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study. E Bio Medicine. (2021) 72:103592. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103592 34619639 PMC 8498227 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Liang Z Hao Y Yang L Yuan P Kang W Liang T. The potential of Klebsiella and Escherichia-Shigella and amino acids metabolism to monitor patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in northwest China. BMC Microbiol. (2023) 23:199. doi: 10.1186/s 12866-023-02927-5 37495941 PMC 10373412 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
