# Outcomes of Severe ARDS COVID-19 Patients Denied for Venovenous ECMO Support: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

**Authors:** Aude Sylvestre, Jean-Marie Forel, Laura Textoris, Ines Gragueb-Chatti, Florence Daviet, Saida Salmi, Mélanie Adda, Antoine Roch, Laurent Papazian, Sami Hraiech, Christophe Guervilly

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051493 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2024-03-05

## TL;DR

This study compares the 90-day survival rates of severe ARDS patients with and without VV-ECMO support due to COVID-19.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into outcomes for patients denied VV-ECMO for severe ARDS caused by COVID-19.

## Key findings

- The 90-day survival rate was similar for ECMO-indicated and ECMO-not-indicated groups at around 62%.
- The ECMO-contraindicated group had a significantly lower survival rate of 20.5%.
- Half of the patients denied VV-ECMO were at home 3 months later despite low survival rates.

## Abstract

Background: Few data are available concerning the outcome of patients denied venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) relative to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. Methods: We compared the 90-day survival rate of consecutive adult patients for whom our center was contacted to discuss VV-ECMO indication. Three groups of patients were created: patients for whom VV-ECMO was immediately indicated (ECMO-indicated group), patients for whom VV-ECMO was not indicated at the time of the call (ECMO-not-indicated group), and patients for whom ECMO was definitely contraindicated (ECMO-contraindicated group). Results: In total, 104 patients were referred for VV-ECMO support due to severe COVID-19 ARDS. Among them, 32 patients had immediate VV-ECMO implantation, 28 patients had no VV-ECMO indication, but 1 was assisted thereafter, and 44 patients were denied VV-ECMO for contraindication. Among the 44 patients denied, 30 were denied for advanced age, 24 for excessive prior duration of mechanical ventilation, and 16 for SOFA score >8. The 90-day survival rate was similar for the ECMO-indicated group and the ECMO-not-indicated group at 62.1 and 61.9%, respectively, whereas it was significantly lower (20.5%) for the ECMO-contraindicated group. Conclusions: Despite a low survival rate, 50% of patients were at home 3 months after being denied for VV-ECMO for severe ARDS due to COVID-19.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** acute respiratory distress syndrome (MONDO:0006502), COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), ARDS (MESH:D012128), severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (MESH:D045169)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10932228/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10932228/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10932228/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10932228