Correction: Clinical improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures during 12-month follow-up
Christer Mjåset, John-Anker Zwart, Frode Kolstad, Tore Solberg, Margreth Grotle
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
The original ethics statement for this article [1] is incorrect.
The correct ethics statement is: This study’s research protocol (2014/1477) was reviewed by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) and was assessed to fall outside the scope of the Health Research Act. This means that the study did not require prior approval from the ethical committees.
The authors apologize for the error in the published article.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Mjåset C, Zwart JA, Kolstad F, Solberg T, Grotle M (2022) Clinical improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures during 12-month follow-up. PLOS ONE 17(3): e 0264954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264954 35259164 PMC 8903279 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗