Erratum to “Bladder-embedded ectopic intrauterine device with calculus”
Bing-Jian Xiong, Guang-Jing Tao, Duo Jiang
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
In the published article Xiong B J, Tao G J, Jiang D. Bladder-embedded ectopic intrauterine device with calculus. Open Med. (Wars) 2020 15(1): 501–507. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0173. PMID: 33336004; PMCID: PMC7712230, due to proofreading errors and misidentification of IUD, IUD types of case 5 and case 9 were incorrectly written as GyneFix in Table 1. Authors requested to modify the IUD type for both cases, with case 5 being changed to MYCu and case 9 being rendered unrecognizable. The changes do not affect the results and conclusions of the study.