Exploring the causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care: A mixed methods study

TL;DR

This study explores why some patients are misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care, finding that misinterpretation of spirometry results is a major cause.

Contribution

The study combines quantitative and qualitative methods to identify the main causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.

Findings

Misinterpretation of spirometry results was the main cause of COPD misdiagnosis, affecting 59% of misdiagnosed patients.

41% of misdiagnosed patients had normal spirometry, and 40% had asthma as their actual diagnosis.

Healthcare professionals' reluctance to challenge historical diagnoses and difficulties in differential diagnosis contribute to COPD misdiagnosis.

Abstract

Within primary care there exists a cohort of patients misdiagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Misdiagnosis can have a detrimental impact on healthcare finances and patient health and so understanding the factors leading to misdiagnosis is crucial in order to reduce misdiagnosis in the future. The objective of this study is to understand and explore the perceived causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.

A sequential mixed methods study, quantifying prevalence and features of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care followed by a qualitative analysis to explore perceived causes of misdiagnosis. Quantitative data was collected for 206 patients identified as misdiagnosed with COPD within the INTEGR COPD study (NCT03482700). Qualitative data collected from 21 healthcare professionals involved in providing COPD care and 8 misdiagnosed patients who were recruited using a maximum variation purposive sampling.

Misinterpretation of spirometry results was the prevailing factor leading to patients initially being misdiagnosed with COPD, affecting 59% of misdiagnosed patients in this cohort. Of the 99 patients who were investigated for their underlying diagnosis; 41% had normal spirometry and 40% had asthma. Further investigation through qualitative methodology uncovered reluctance to challenge historical misdiagnoses and challenges in differential diagnosis as the underlying explanations for COPD misdiagnosis in this cohort.

Patients historically diagnosed with COPD without spirometric evidence are at risk of remaining labelled and treated for COPD despite non-obstructive respiratory physiology, leading to a persistent cohort of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care. The lack of spirometry services during and after the COVID19 pandemic in primary care risks adding to the cohort of misdiagnosed patients. Support from respiratory specialists can potentially help to reduce the prevalence of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.

NCT03482700.

Figures