# Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers

## TL;DR

This study explores how oxygen use changes during low-effort cycling in people with pulmonary hypertension and healthy individuals.

## Contribution

The study introduces a new CPET parameter, PIW (Watt), which may help assess pulmonary hypertension without maximal exercise.

## Key findings

- PIW was slightly lower in patients compared to healthy controls.
- PIW (Watt) was higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
- PIW (Watt) differences were also observed at submaximal workloads.

## Abstract

Recently, the parameter internal work (IW) has been introduced as change in oxygen uptake (VO2) between resting and unloading workload in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The proportional IW (PIW) was defined as IW divided by VO2 at peak exercise. A second option is to calculate the PIW based on the workload [PIW (Watt)] by considering the aerobic efficiency. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IW and PIW differ between patients with and without pulmonary hypertension and healthy controls. Our study population consisted of 580 patients and 354 healthy controls derived from the Study of Health in Pomerania. The PIW was slightly lower in patients (14.2%) than in healthy controls (14.9%; p = 0.030), but the PIW (Watt) was higher in patients (18.0%) than in the healthy controls (15.9%; p = 0.001). Such a difference was also observed, when considering only the submaximal workload up to the VAT (19.8% in patients and 15.1% in healthy controls; p < 0.001). Since the PIW (Watt) values were higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension, this marker may serve as a useful CPET parameter in clinical practice. In contrast to most of the currently used CPET parameters, the PIW does not require a maximal workload for the patient. Further studies are needed to validate the prognostic significance of the PIW.