Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLegal Cases and Commentary · Legal case studies and regulations · Digital Media and Visual Art
In regards to:
Harold A Burgess, Edward A Burton, A critical review of zebrafish neurological disease models–1. The premise: neuroanatomical, cellular, and genetic homology, and experimental tractability, Oxford Open Neuroscience, 2023;, kvac018, https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvac018
and
Edward A Burton, Harold A Burgess, A critical review of zebrafish neurological disease models–2. Application: functional and neuroanatomical phenotyping strategies and chemical screens, Oxford Open Neuroscience, 2022;, kvac019, https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvac019,
The publisher apologizes to readers for any confusion caused by the advance access publication dates for these articles. Together, these articles comprise a two-part review and should have been published with the same advance access publication date. For the avoidance of doubt, below are the relevant manuscript processing dates for both articles.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvac018
Received: October 2, 2022
Revised: November 13, 2022
Accepted: December 1, 2022
Advance access publication: January 6, 2023
Corrected proof publication: March 3, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvac019
Received: October 2, 2022
Revised: November 28, 2022
Accepted: December 1, 2022
Advance access publication: December 9, 2022
Corrected proof publication: March 3, 2023
These details have been reinforced in this Publisher’s Note to preserve the published version of record.