Subjective feelings associated with expectations and rewards during risky decision-making in impulse control disorder
Brittany Liebenow, Angela Jiang, Emily K. DiMarco, L. Paul Sands, Mary Moya-Mendez, Adrian W. Laxton, Mustafa S. Siddiqui, Ihtsham ul Haq, Kenneth T. Kishida

TL;DR
The study explores how people with Parkinson’s disease and impulse control disorder experience emotions during risky decisions, and how dopamine medication affects these feelings.
Contribution
The study reveals how expectations and dopamine therapy influence subjective feelings in risky decision-making among Parkinson’s patients with and without ICD.
Findings
Subjective feelings of pleasure are influenced differently by expectations in patients with ICD compared to those without.
Dopaminergic medication reduces the difference in how expectations affect feelings between ICD and non-ICD patients.
Computational models suggest that ICD alters the link between decision-making factors and subjective emotional responses.
Abstract
Impulse Control Disorder (ICD) in Parkinson’s disease is a behavioral addiction induced by dopaminergic therapies, but otherwise unclear etiology. The current study investigates the interaction of reward processing variables, dopaminergic therapy, and risky decision-making and subjective feelings in patients with versus without ICD. Patients with (n = 18) and without (n = 12) ICD performed a risky decision-making task both ‘on’ and ‘off’ standard-of-care dopaminergic therapies (the task was performed on 2 different days with the order of on and off visits randomized for each patient). During each trial of the task, participants choose between two options, a gamble or a certain reward, and reported how they felt about decision outcomes. Subjective feelings of ‘pleasure’ are differentially driven by expectations of possible outcomes in patients with, versus without ICD. While off…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science
