# Propofol Infusions and Their Role for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

**Authors:** Matthew Owrey, Kevin J Min, Marc Torjman

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53447 · Cureus · 2024-02-02

## TL;DR

This study found that using propofol during surgery for head and neck cancer did not improve patient survival, suggesting more research is needed.

## Contribution

The study is the first to investigate the effect of propofol on survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

## Key findings

- Propofol infusions did not significantly improve survival in HNSCC patients.
- Surgery duration and hospital stay were longer for patients receiving propofol.
- No significant difference in survival was found even after adjusting for tumor markers.

## Abstract

Purpose: Propofol infusions may improve survival for patients undergoing surgery for various types of cancer. However, propofol has not been shown to improve survival for all cancer types. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether propofol infusions during surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) improved survival.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC with neck dissection at one institution between June 15, 2017, and April 28, 2021. The primary analysis was performed as a cohort study, with one cohort receiving a propofol infusion and the other cohort not receiving a propofol infusion. A second analysis was performed as a case-control study with matching by cancer staging, human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16 status, pathology margin status, surgical duration within 90 minutes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) within a score of 1. Cases included patients who received a propofol infusion, and controls were patients who did not receive a propofol infusion.

Results: For the primary analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.650), BMI (p=0.956), sex (p=0.069), and CCI (p=0.351), but there was a statistically significant difference in ASA status (p=0.003). The time exposed to sevoflurane (MAC >0.3) was significantly higher in the no-propofol group (p<0.001). The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the propofol patient group compared to the no-propofol group (p=0.013). The length of hospital stay was roughly two days longer for the propofol group (p=0.029). There was no difference in survival for patients who did not receive propofol versus those who did (p=0.247), even after adjusting for HPV/p16 tumor marker status (p=0.223). When patients were matched in a case-control approach, there were no differences in age (p=0.956), BMI (p=0.828), CCI (p=1.000), or ASA status (p=1.000). The death rate was not significant between the cases and controls (p=0.311).

Conclusions: This data suggests that propofol may not influence survival in patients with HNSCC. Larger studies are necessary to better characterize the effect of propofol infusions on patients with HNSCC.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** propofol (PubChem CID 4943), sevoflurane (PubChem CID 5206)
- **Diseases:** head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (MONDO:0010150)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CDKN2A (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) [NCBI Gene 1029] {aka ARF, CAI2, CDK4I, CDKN2, CMM2, INK4}
- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), death (MESH:D003643), HNSCC (MESH:D000077195)
- **Chemicals:** sevoflurane (MESH:D000077149), Propofol (MESH:D015742)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Human papillomavirus (species) [taxon 10566]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10909378/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10909378/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10909378/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10909378