A Modified H-index Calculated Using the Duration of Professional Experience and the Author's Significant Contribution to Publications
Faruk Tas, Kayhan Erturk

TL;DR
This paper proposes a modified h-index that considers a scientist's professional experience and contribution to publications.
Contribution
A new h-index variant incorporating professional duration and author contribution significance.
Findings
The traditional h-index does not account for professional experience or author contribution.
The modified h-index better reflects a scientist's true impact by including these factors.
Abstract
Recently, the h-index (HI) has been accepted as a globally valid indicator that measures the professional achievement of scientists. Although it has been criticized in some respects, it is the most frequently used parameter as a criterion that generally measures the number and quality of publications combined. In the evaluation of the scientific publication, apart from these, the duration (years) of professional experience of the scientist and the impact/significance of the author's contribution to publications should also be used; however, HI does not take these into account. In this article, we present our recommendations for a modified HI considering these two important parameters.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
