# Anesthesia Approach to Managing Severe Hemorrhagic Shock and Anemia With Non-transfusion Alternatives in a Practicing Jehovah's Witness: A Case Report

## TL;DR

This case report describes the successful management of severe hemorrhagic shock in a Jehovah's Witness patient using non-transfusion methods, respecting their religious beliefs.

## Contribution

The paper presents a novel clinical approach to managing traumatic hemorrhagic shock in a Jehovah's Witness patient without blood transfusions.

## Key findings

- The patient's hemoglobin stabilized at 5.3 g/dL using intravenous iron, high-dose erythropoietin, and phlebotomy minimization.
- A multi-disciplinary team achieved favorable outcomes through customized non-transfusion techniques.
- Ethical challenges were navigated by respecting patient autonomy while delivering evidence-based care.

## Abstract

Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is a common yet life-threatening occurrence across the United States and is typically managed with blood transfusions as the standard of care. However, providers caring for a Jehovah's Witness patient who refuses transfusions due to religious reasons face unique ethical challenges in upholding evidence-based shock resuscitation protocols while respecting the patient's autonomy and faith-based stance that strictly prohibits blood products. We present a complex clinical case of a 46-year-old Jehovah's Witness who developed severe hemorrhagic shock, partial amputation, and critical anemia after a traumatic 40-mile-per-hour motorcycle collision resulting in comminuted fractures and arterial disruption. Despite receiving emergent blood transfusions initially, further transfusions were declined once his identity as a practicing Jehovah's Witness was disclosed. His hemoglobin plunged to dangerously low levels of 4.6 g/dL before stabilizing to 5.3 g/dL with pharmaceutical alternatives including intravenous iron, high-dose erythropoietin, and phlebotomy minimization. Respecting patient convictions while delivering effective evidence-based shock management created significant ethical conflicts given the proven efficacy of blood transfusions. However, this complex case demonstrates that through meticulous medical and surgical care coordinated by a multi-disciplinary team applying customized non-transfusion techniques, traumatic hemorrhagic shock and life-threatening anemia can still achieve favorable outcomes without relying on transfusions when respecting faith-based refusal of blood products.