Increased Knowledge Mediates the Effect of Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention on Diffusion of Cervical Cancer Screening Advocacy Among Social Network Members in a Pilot Trial
Ishita Ghai, Glenn J. Wagner, Joseph K. B. Matovu, Margrethe Juncker, Eve Namisango, Kathryn Bouskill, Sylvia Nakami, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Emmanuel Luyirika, Rhoda K. Wanyenze

TL;DR
A peer-led training program increased cervical cancer prevention advocacy among participants and their social network members, with increased knowledge playing a key role in spreading the advocacy.
Contribution
This study identifies increased knowledge as a mediator of advocacy diffusion in a social network context for cervical cancer prevention.
Findings
Increased cervical cancer knowledge partially mediated the intervention's effect on advocacy engagement among social network members.
The intervention's effect on advocacy was not moderated by alter characteristics.
Knowledge gains were linked to greater engagement in cervical cancer prevention advocacy.
Abstract
Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP), a peer-led, group advocacy training intervention, increased cervical cancer (CC) prevention advocacy not only among intervention recipients, but also their social network members (referred to as “alters”) who were targeted with advocacy in a pilot randomized controlled trial. We examined mediators and moderators of this effect on alter advocacy, to understand how and for whom the intervention had such an effect. Forty women (index participants) who had recently screened for CC enrolled and were randomly assigned to receive the GC-CCP intervention (n = 20) or the wait-list control (n = 20). Up to three alters from each participant (n = 103) were surveyed at baseline and month 6. Measures of CC-related cognitive constructs (knowledge, enacted stigma, and risk management self-efficacy), as well as extent of advocacy received from…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBehavioral Health and Interventions · Media Influence and Health · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
