# Predictive factors and treatment challenges in malignant progression of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

**Authors:** Masoud Ghiasian, Rashed Bawand, Sulmaz Jabarzadeh, Abbas Moradi

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26658 · Heliyon · 2024-02-17

## TL;DR

This study identifies factors that predict a severe form of multiple sclerosis and finds that current treatments are less effective for this aggressive type.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific clinical and MRI-based factors that distinguish malignant RRMS and highlights treatment limitations for this subgroup.

## Key findings

- Malignant RRMS is associated with older age of onset, male gender, more relapses, and multifocal attacks.
- Malignant RRMS patients have higher plaque burden and black hole lesions on MRI scans.
- Current escalation strategies for DMTs are ineffective for malignant RRMS, leading to poor outcomes.

## Abstract

Our objective was to uncover the predictive factors that can help anticipate the malignant progression of individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Additionally, we sought to analyze and compare the response to treatment between patients with benign and malignant forms of RRMS.

This cohort study included RRMS patients categorized as benign (≥10 years since disease onset, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≤ 1) or malignant (≤5 years since disease onset, EDSS ≥6). Patients’ data, including demographics, medical history, treatment, and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) scans, were collected and statistically analyzed.

Among the 254 patients diagnosed with RRMS, 174 were found to have benign RRMS, while the remaining 80 were diagnosed with malignant RRMS. Notably, patients with malignant RRMS exhibited a significantly higher mean age of onset (32.00 ± 7.96 vs. 25.70 ± 17.19; P < 0.001) and a greater prevalence of males (40% vs. 18.4%; P = 0.014). Additionally, within the initial five years of diagnosis, patients with malignant RRMS experienced a higher number of relapses (median: 4 vs. 2; P < 0.001) and hospitalizations (median: 2 vs. 1; P = 0.006) compared to those with benign RRMS. Clinical presentations of malignant RRMS were predominantly characterized by multifocal attacks, whereas unifocal attacks were more prevalent in patients with benign RRMS. MRI scans revealed that malignant RRMS patients displayed a higher burden of plaques in the infratentorial and cord regions, as well as a greater number of black hole lesions. Conversely, benign RRMS patients exhibited a higher number of Gadolinium-enhanced lesions. Utilizing Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) with an escalating approach has shown effectiveness in managing benign RRMS. However, it has proven insufficient in addressing malignant RRMS, resulting in frequent transitions to higher-line DMTs. As a result, it places a considerable burden on patients with malignant RRMS, consuming valuable time and resources, and ultimately yielding subpar outcomes.

Our study identifies prognostic factors for malignant progression in RRMS, including older age of onset, male gender, increased relapses and hospitalizations, multifocal attacks, higher plaque load, and black hole lesions. The current escalation strategy for DMTs is insufficient for managing malignant RRMS, requiring alternative approaches for improved outcomes. In other words, MS is a spectrum rather than a single disease, and some patients progress to a malignant phenotype of MS that is not effectively treated by the current approach.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** multiple sclerosis (MONDO:0005301), Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (MONDO:0005314)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hole lesions (MESH:D012167), MS (MESH:D009103), RRMS (MESH:D020529)
- **Chemicals:** Gadolinium (MESH:D005682)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900812/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900812/full.md

## References

61 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900812/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900812