# Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions

**Authors:** Xu Zuo, Xin Zhao, Jinjin Shi, Tiandong Zhang

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s40360-024-00743-9 · BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology · 2024-02-27

## TL;DR

This study shows that a generic cotrimoxazole tablet is as effective and safe as the branded version in healthy Chinese volunteers when taken on an empty stomach.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence of bioequivalence between a generic and branded cotrimoxazole formulation in a Chinese population under fasting conditions.

## Key findings

- The generic and branded cotrimoxazole formulations showed no significant differences in key pharmacokinetic parameters.
- All 90% confidence intervals for the pharmacokinetic parameters fell within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%.
- No serious adverse events were reported, indicating the safety of the generic formulation.

## Abstract

This bioequivalence study was conducted to evaluate two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. All 26 subjects recruited to this study were randomly and evenly classified into two groups and received a single dose (sulfamethoxazole: 400 mg and trimethoprim: 80 mg) of test cotrimoxazole tablets (generic drug) or reference cotrimoxazole tablets (branded drug). After a 7-day washout period, these subjects received one dose of reference drug or test drug. Blood samples were collected from participants before and up to 48 h after dosing to assess the concentration of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and trimethoprim (TMP) in plasma and a plasma concentration-time curve was drawn. Then, the pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated accordingly. Our data revealed that there were no significant differences observed in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) between the two formulations. For SMX, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric mean ratio for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 104.03-113.92%, 100.46-103.70%, and 100.41-103.81%, respectively. Similarly, for Trimethoprim (TMP), the 90% CI ranged from 98.54 to 106.95% for Cmax, from 99.31 to 107.68% for AUC0-t, and from 99.49 to 107.55% for AUC0-∞. Importantly, all these 90% CI values fell within the range of 80.00–125.00%, indicating that the test drug is bioequivalent to the reference drug. Furthermore, throughout the entire trial, no suspected serious adverse events were reported, indicating the safety profile of the newly developed generic cotrimoxazole. In summary, our study demonstrates that the newly developed generic formulation of cotrimoxazole is bioequivalent to the branded formulation under fasting conditions.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cotrimoxazole (PubChem CID 358641), sulfamethoxazole (PubChem CID 5329), trimethoprim (PubChem CID 5578)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** TMP (MESH:D014295), SMX (MESH:D013420), cotrimoxazole (MESH:D015662)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900551/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900551/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900551/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10900551