# An ECG-based artificial intelligence model for assessment of sudden cardiac death risk

**Authors:** Lauri Holmstrom, Harpriya Chugh, Kotoka Nakamura, Ziana Bhanji, Madison Seifer, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Kyndaron Reinier, David Ouyang, Sumeet S. Chugh

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00451-9 · Communications Medicine · 2024-02-27

## TL;DR

A deep learning model using ECG data can better predict sudden cardiac death risk than traditional methods.

## Contribution

A deep learning model for ECG-based sudden cardiac death risk assessment that outperforms conventional models.

## Key findings

- The DL model achieved an AUROC of 0.889 in internal testing and 0.820 in external validation.
- The DL model outperformed a conventional ECG model with AUROCs of 0.712 and 0.743 in internal and external cohorts.
- The model could improve SCD risk stratification and enable early monitoring of high-risk individuals.

## Abstract

Conventional ECG-based algorithms could contribute to sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification but demonstrate moderate predictive capabilities. Deep learning (DL) models use the entire digital signal and could potentially improve predictive power. We aimed to train and validate a 12 lead ECG-based DL algorithm for SCD risk assessment.

Out-of-hospital SCD cases were prospectively ascertained in the Portland, Oregon, metro area. A total of 1,827 pre- cardiac arrest 12 lead ECGs from 1,796 SCD cases were retrospectively collected and analyzed to develop an ECG-based DL model. External validation was performed in 714 ECGs from 714 SCD cases from Ventura County, CA. Two separate control group samples were obtained from 1342 ECGs taken from 1325 individuals of which at least 50% had established coronary artery disease. The DL model was compared with a previously validated conventional 6 variable ECG risk model.

The DL model achieves an AUROC of 0.889 (95% CI 0.861–0.917) for the detection of SCD cases vs. controls in the internal held-out test dataset, and is successfully validated in external SCD cases with an AUROC of 0.820 (0.794–0.847). The DL model performs significantly better than the conventional ECG model that achieves an AUROC of 0.712 (0.668–0.756) in the internal and 0.743 (0.711–0.775) in the external cohort.

An ECG-based DL model distinguishes SCD cases from controls with improved accuracy and performs better than a conventional ECG risk model. Further detailed investigation is warranted to evaluate how the DL model could contribute to improved SCD risk stratification.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) occurs when there are problems with the electrical activity within the heart. It is a common cause of death throughout the world so it would be beneficial to be able to easily identify individuals that are at high risk of SCD. Electrocardiograms are a cheap and widely available way to measure electrical activity in the heart. We developed a computational method that can use electrocardiograms to determine whether a person is at increased risk of having a SCD. Our computational method could allow clinicians to screen large numbers of people and identify those at a higher risk of SCD. This could enable regular monitoring of these people and might enable SCDs to be prevented in some individuals.

Holmstrom et al. train and validate a 12 lead ECG-based deep learning algorithm for sudden cardiac death risk assessment. The model accurately distinguishes sudden cardiac death cases from controls, performing better than a conventional ECG risk model.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** sudden cardiac death (MONDO:0007264), coronary artery disease (MONDO:0005010)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SCD (MESH:D016757), coronary artery disease (MESH:D003324), cardiac arrest (MESH:D006323)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10899257/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10899257/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10899257/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10899257