Bolus Feeding Via Gastric Versus Oral Routes in Very Preterm Neonates
Rita P. Verma, Deepank Sahni, Joshua Fogel
TL;DR
This study compares bolus orogastric tube and nipple bottle feeding in very preterm neonates and finds that oral feeding helps with faster growth and shorter hospital stays.
Contribution
The study identifies the benefits of early oral feeding over orogastric tube feeding in very preterm neonates.
Findings
Oral bottle feeding accelerates postnatal catch-up growth and reduces hospitalization duration.
Bolus orogastric tube feeding has no independent negative effects unless combined with oral feeding.
Starting nipple feeding at 32 weeks postmenstrual age may be safe for stable very preterm neonates.
Abstract
We intend to investigate the association of bolus orogastric tube (BOG) and nipple bottle (N) feedings with postnatal growth in very premature neonates (VPN: gestational age between 28 and 33 weeks). The days of life (DOL) to achieve full combined oral and gastric enteral nutrition (FEN) and attain body weight (BW) of 2200 g (Wt22) and the length of hospitalization (LOH) were retrospectively associated with clinical and BOG and N feeding-related variables via multivariate regression analyses. Correlations were performed to ascertain the strength of associations. In a cohort of 127 VPN, FEN demonstrated negative associations with gestational age (GA) and LOH and Wt22 with birth weight (BW). FEN showed positive associations with nil by mouth and intravenous fluid-nutrition days and with DOL to start and achieve full nipple feeding. LOH was associated with days on antibiotics and DOL to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 30.6 (1.9) |
| Birthweight (grams) | 1,482 (43.9) |
| Male | 65 (51.2) |
| Non-Caucasian | 84 (66.1) |
| Apgar at five minutes of life | 7.8 (1.2) |
| Total number of days on antibiotics | 5.2 (4.8) |
| Oxygen or positive pressure therapy | 102 (80.3) |
| PDA | 18 (14.2) |
| NEC | 2 (1.6) |
| Maternal hypertension | 43 (34.5) |
| Maternal diabetes mellitus | 14 (10.9) |
| Antenatal steroids | 117 (92.1) |
| Antenatal magnesium sulfate | 108 (85.7) |
| Antenatal antibiotics | 74 (64.2) |
| NPO days | 4.7 (4.2) |
| Total days on intravenous fluids-nutrition | 18.1 (13.49) |
| DOL when any feeding was started | 3.4 (1.97) |
| DOL when gastric bolus feeding was started | 3.6 (2.18) |
| DOL when nipple feeding was started | 14.2 (14.52) |
| GA, when nipple feeding was started | 32.4 (1.18) |
| DOL when full nipple feeding was achieved | 25.7 (18.96) |
| Colostrum intake | 80 (62.9) |
| Maternal breast milk intake | 93 (73.2) |
| Daily weight gain | 22.6 (6.85) |
| Length of hospitalization (days) (LOH) | 44.8 (20.7) |
| Days to reach 2200 grams of body weight (Wt22) | 36.1 (17.8) |
| Day of life when full feeding achieved (gastric and nipple feeding combined) (FEN) | 18.8 (12.3) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | −5.39 (0.33) | −1.06 (0.52) |
| Birthweight (g) | −0.03 (0.002) | <0.001 (0.002) |
| Male gender | 0.92 (2.47) | – |
| Non-Caucasian ethnicity | −0.85 (2.60) | – |
| Apgar score at five minutes of life | −4.45 (0.90) | 0.24 (0.45) |
| Days on antibiotics | 22.53 (3.05) | 1.87 (1.95) |
| Oxygen or positive pressure therapy | 15.52 (3.44) | −3.45 (1.89) |
| PDA | 14.81 (3.47) | 1.44 (1.78) |
| NPO days | 15.12 (1.94) | 4.30 (1.23)** |
| Colostrum intake | 6.66 (2.63) | −1.63 (1.17) |
| Maternal breast milk intake | 4.98 (2.91) | |
| Total days on intravenous fluid-nutrition | 35.48 (1.90) | 14.48 (2.97) |
| DOL when gastric bolus feed started | 2.60 (0.52) | 0.29 (0.36) |
| DOL when nipple feeding started | 0.81 (0.05) | 0.22 (0.07)** |
| GA, when nipple feeding was started | −0.57 (1.05) | – |
| DOL of achieving full nipple feeding | 0.62 (0.04) | 0.14 (0.06) |
| Daily weight gain (grams) | −3.73 (10.31) | – |
| Intercept | – | 27.29 (17.52) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | −8.84 (0.55) | −0.87 (0.77) |
| Birthweight (g) | −0.04 (0.003) | −0.02 (0.003) |
| Male gender | 3.27 (3.69) | – |
| Non-Caucasian ethnicity | 3.92 (3.89) | – |
| Apgar at five minutes of life | −4.99 (1.47) | 1.10 (0.67) |
| Days on antibiotics | 32.39 (4.92) | 6.57 (2.89) |
| Oxygen or positive pressure therapy | 24.99 (5.31) | −0.3 (2.65) |
| PDA | 23.87 (5.36) | −0.68 (2.51) |
| Colostrum intake | 12.26 (4.04) | 1.29 (1.90) |
| Maternal breast milk intake | 8.90 (4.50) | −0.87 (2.04) |
| NPO days | 38.67 (5.17) | 1.07 (3.89) |
| Total days on intravenous fluid-nutrition | 48.63 (3.54) | 5.08 (4.44) |
| DOL gastric bolus feed started | 3.25 (0.81) | −0.33 (0.52) |
| DOL when nipple feeding was started | 1.37 (0.08) | 0.29 (0.12) |
| GA when nipple feeding was started | −0.39 (1.57) | – |
| DOL when full nipple feeding achieved | 1.05 (0.05) | 0.38 (0.10) |
| Daily weight gain (g) | 16.09 (15.25) | – |
| Intercept | – | 60.07 (26.35) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age | −7.28 (0. 15) | −0.13 (0.49) |
| Birthweight (g) | −0.04 (0.001) | −0.03 (0.002) |
| Male gender | 1.08 (3.18) | – |
| Non-Caucasian ethnicity | 0.94 (3.36) | – |
| Apgar score at five minutes of life | −4.84 (1.25) | −0.34 (0.43) |
| Days on antibiotics | 22.24 (4.48) | 1.26 (1.83) |
| Oxygen or positive pressure therapy | 21.89 (4.81) | −0.36 (1.89) |
| PDA | 22.10 (4.81) | 0.24 (1.77) |
| NPO days | 12.54 (2.88) | 1.98 (1.15) |
| Colostrum intake | 10.80 (3.65) | 0.25 (1.16) |
| Maternal breast milk intake | 7.59 (4.06) | – |
| Total days on intravenous fluid-nutrition | 40.84 (3.14) | 2.69 (2.81) |
| DOL when OG bolus feed was started | 2.88 (0.69) | 0.37 (0.33) |
| DOL when nipple feeding started | 1.12 (0.07) | 0.07 (0.08) |
| GA, when nipple feeding was started | −0.47 (1.35) | – |
| DOL of achieving full nipple feeding | 0.87 (0.05) | 0.19 (0.06) |
| Daily weight gain (g) | 6.67 (13.15) | – |
| Intercept | – | 76.56 (16.69) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. LOH | 1 | |||||
| 2. DOL to reach 2200g of BW | 0.87 | 1 | ||||
| 3. DOL when gavage feeding was started | 0.36 | 0.37 | 1 | 0.40 | ||
| 4. DOL when nipple feed was started | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.83 | |
| 5. DOL of full gavage & nipple feeds | 0.83 | 0.80 | 1 | |||
| 6. DOL of full nipple feeds | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 1 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfant Nutrition and Health · Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Introduction
Nipple feeding via bottle in preterm neonates is provided by contingent care based on readiness cues. Acquisition of this developmental function is governed by neurological maturation and autonomic, motor and behavioral state organization [1]. Feeding behavior in preterm infants matures between 33 and 36 weeks after conception, and sucking-swallowing coordination is well developed by 34–36 weeks of gestation [2,3,4,5].
The requirement of nutrients that would match the in-utero accretion rate is significantly high during the postnatal period in preterm infants [6]. The physiological rate of weight gain in these infants is about twice as much as their term counterparts [7]. Clinical decisions regarding the type, volume, osmolality and rate of advancements of enteral feeding play critical roles in their postnatal growth [8,9]. According to a recent report, 22–25% of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population comprises neonates born between 28 and 33 weeks [10]. Infants in this group, categorized as very premature neonates (VPN), are deprived of the nutritional accretion and rapid weight gain acquired during the 3^rd^ trimester of intrauterine life.
Enteral nutrition is provided via gastric tube as a continuous drip or intermittent bolus in preterm neonates until they are clinically ready for bottle feeding [9, 11, 12]. Studies that reported the benefits of early trophic gastric tube feeding on postnatal growth and development did not separate continuous and bolus gastric feeding practices. These results were not supported in a Cochrane review [13].
We investigated the associations of postnatal days taken to achieve full enteral feeding (FEN), to gain the minimum body weight consistent with term status, and the duration of hospitalization with enteral nutrition provided by intermittent bolus through an orogastric tube (BOG) and orally with nipple and bottle (N) in VPN. The aim was to examine the effects of bolus feedings given via gastric and oral routes on postnatal growth.
Material and methods
This retrospective cohort single-center study was conducted at a suburban teaching hospital in Long Island, New York. All preterm infants born between 27,0/7 and 32,6/7 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted to the NICU during a designated period were candidates for the study. Those who suffered from congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal, respiratory, genitourinary, cardiovascular, central nervous, intrauterine growth, skin, and other organ systems or expired during the study period were excluded. The following neonatal variables were studied in the enrolled infants: GA; birth weight (BW); gender; mode of delivery (cesarean or vaginal); ethnicity; Apgar scores at five minutes of life; the receipt of any respiratory support including oxygen (O_2_), distending pressure or mechanical ventilation; necrotizing enterocolitis in stage two or over (NEC); patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) as diagnosed via echocardiography of any size; the total number of days on antibiotics as administered for suspected, clinical or culture-proven sepsis; and the length of hospitalization (LOH). The caretaking team made all clinical decisions and followed the standard sepsis evaluation and treatment protocols as per American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. The variables related to neonatal nutrition were as follows: day of life (DOL) when enteral feed was started by nipple (N) or as bolus via OG tube (BOG); DOL and GA when nipple feeding was started; the total number of days on parenteral fluids including 10% dextrose solution or hyperalimentation; use of any volume of colostrum and expressed maternal breast milk; DOL to reach full enteral feeding by OG tube, nipple or both combined (FEN); DOL of achieving full enteral feeding via nipple; the total number of days when the infant was nil by mouth (NPO); daily weight gain; and the number of days to achieve a bodyweight of 2200g (Wt22). Expressed maternal breast milk for the first five post-delivery days was considered as colostrum. The following maternal variables were included in the study: hypertension or diabetes mellitus of any severity during pregnancy and any receipt of steroids, magnesium sulfate, or antibiotics within four weeks of delivery. The neonatal and maternal variables were analyzed for their association with LOH (days), FEN (days), and Wt22 (days) as the outcome variables. The body weight of 2200 g was selected as it is the tenth percentile for 37 weeks of gestation, which defines term status. The GA was determined by the last menstrual period dating and fetal ultrasound and was confirmed at birth by incorporating the standard Ballard scoring in the physical examination.
The neonates were started on intermittent bolus trophic feeds via OG tube with 10–20 ml/kg/d of expressed colostrum, maternal breast milk (MBM) as available, and mixed with the premature Enfamil 20 calories (PE20) formula during DOL 0–3 as allowed by the clinical stability [13]. Standard soft polyvinyl chloride or silicone feeding tubes of appropriate size (NeoMed Enfit) were used. OG tube was removed, and a new one was inserted for each feeding. Infants were started on parenteral nutrition within the first 24 hours of life with 10% dextrose solution, 2–3 g/kg/d of amino acids, and 1–2 g/kg/d of lipids and gradually increased to a maximum of 4 g/kg/d of protein and 3 g/kg/d of lipids while adjusting for the enteral nutrition. Initial fluids were provided at 80 ml/kg/day The volume of the feeding aliquot was advanced after being on trophic feeds for 3–7 days, as per feeding tolerance and clinical condition, by a maximum of 20–30 ml/kg/day to reach the total volume of 140–150 ml/kg/day and 110–120 calories/kg/day, which were considered as full feeds.
Bottle nipple feeding was tried at approximately 32–33 weeks of postmenstrual age by following the neonatal cues for readiness, such as synchronous vigorous nonnutritive sucking without bradycardia, oxygen desaturation, or apnea. Initially, nipple feeding was tried every 8–12 hours with full or partial aliquot as tolerated without significant change in vital signs or clinical status. The nipple feeding was interrupted, and an OG tube was inserted for the remaining volume if the infant stopped nippling or the clinical status did not permit its continuation. The nipple feeding tolerance varied among infants and was clinically dealt with as needed. The recorded day of starting nipple feeding was not changed for analysis, even if it was interrupted for over 24 hours for any reason. The babies were not restricted from putting on the breast, but it was infrequent and was followed by bottle feedings as the major source of nutrition. Colostrum and expressed maternal breast milk were used as available. MBM was fortified to 22 calories per ounce when infants tolerated 40–60 ml/kg/d of enteral feeding and then to 24 calories per ounce. Premature Enfamil 24-calorie formula was introduced after 5–7 days of PE20 intake. Parenteral nutrition was supplemented and adjusted to the total volume of enteral nutrition. The Institutional Review Board approved the study before commencement.
Statistical analysis
The numerical variables were analyzed as mean and standard deviation and the categorical ones as frequency and percentage. Skewed variables with zero values had one added to be logarithmically transformed. Univariate linear regression was conducted for each of the outcome variables. The multivariate linear regression with Beta co-efficient analysis included statistically significant predictors in the univariate analysis. Pearson correlation coefficient tests were utilized to estimate the strength of the relationship between variables. IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25 was used for all analyses. All p-values were two-tailed.
Results
The clinical characteristics of the infants and mothers and the feeding-related neonatal variables are presented in Table 1. One hundred and thirty-four neonates were born during the study period, out of which seven were excluded for incomplete data and congenital anomalies. One hundred and twenty-seven eligible infants were included in the final analysis. Fifty-one percent of the infants were male, and 66.1% were non-Caucasian. The mean (standard deviation) of GA in infants was 30.6(1.9) weeks, and that of BW was 1482 (43.9) g. The mean (standard deviation) of FEN and that of Wt22 were 18.8(12.3) and 36.1(17.8) days, respectively, while that of the LOH was 44.8 (20.7) days.
Tables 2–4 present the linear regression analyses with values of unstandardized beta (B), standard error (SE), and probability (p) for FEN, LOH and Wt22. For all three outcome variables, several associations noted in the univariate analysis lost significance in the multivariate analyses. FEN had a negative association with GA and positive associations with NPO days, total days on intravenous fluid nutrition and DOL of starting and achieving full nipple feeding in the multivariate analysis (Table 2). LOH had a negative association with BW and positive associations with days on antibiotics and DOL of starting and achieving full nipple feeding (Table 3). Wt22 showed a negative association with BW and a positive association with DOL of achieving full nipple feeding (Table 4). Colostrum was associated with all three outcome variables in univariate but not multivariate analysis, while MBM was associated with LOH in univariate analysis only. The antenatal exposure to steroids did not show any associations in the regression analyses of any outcome variables at unstandardized beta (standard error) of 1.88(7.66) for LOH, 2.06(6.91) for W22, and −.27(4.93) for FEN in univariate analysis. Likewise, expressed in beta (SE), maternal hypertension −6.39(4.22) for LOH, −0.36(3.85) for Wt22, −5.03(2.71) for FEN], antenatal magnesium sulfate [6.46(5.76) for LOH, 10.36(5.13) for Wt22, 5.84(3.69) for FEN] and antenatal antibiotics [2.32(4.17) for LOH, −0.23(3.77) for Wt22, 0.75(2.69) for FEN] did not demonstrate significant associations in univariate analysis. Maternal diabetes mellitus had significant associations with LOH [−15(6.33), p < 0.05], Wt22 [−16.7(5.65), p < 0.001] and FEN [−8.59(4.11), p < 0.05] in univariate analysis which declined in the multivariate analyses. The strongest correlations were noted between DOL of achieving full nipple feeding and the LOH (r = 0.88 p < 0.001), Wt22 (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), FEN (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and DOL of starting nipple feeding (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) (Table 5). DOL of starting nipple feeding also had strong correlations with Wt22 (r = 0.81, p < 0.001), LOH (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) and FEN (r = 0.83 p < 0.001). In contrast, DOL, when gavage feed was started, had weak correlations with LOS (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), Wt22 (r = 0.37, p ≤ 0.001), FEN (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) and DOL of starting nipple feeding (r = 0.38, p < 0.001). FEN correlated strongly with Wt22 (r = 0.8, p < 0.001), and LOH (r = 0.83, P < 0.001).
Discussion
This study investigated the implications of bolus feeding given via oral or gastric routes on postnatal growth in very premature neonates. We examined the chronological age to achieve full enteral feeding, the minimum body weight corresponding to term status as the postnatal growth milestones and the duration of hospitalization. The results suggest that bolus feeding supplemented through an orogastric tube and bypassing oral suck and swallow function has no clinical contribution to these outcomes unless combined with nipple feeding, whereas nipple bottle feeding independently accelerates the achievements of total enteral nutrition and catch-up growth and reduces hospitalization duration in VPN. The start day of nipple feeding was found to be a strong determinant of the three tested postnatal outcome measures. The start date of BOG feeding, while having no independent associations, revealed a weak though highly significant relation with postnatal growth and discharge age of VPN, underscoring its small and interdependent role in their nutritional management. The postnatal maturation statuses were different for the two modalities at the start of feeding, being three to four days for orogastric and about two weeks for oral nipple feeding as clinically mandated. A Cochrane meta-analysis, which did not distinguish between continuous and bolus orogastric feeding methods, concluded that trophic orogastric feeding has no role in enhancing gut function, improving feeding tolerance, and reducing hospital stay in preterm infants [12, 13]. According to another meta-analysis, continuous OG feeding trends to take longer to achieve full feeding than bolus OG feeding [14]. Our study eliminated the potentially confounding effects of continuous OG feeding on the results by exclusively examining the bolus gastric feeding method. The results specified the limits and scope of the contribution of bolus orogastric feeding to the postnatal enteral nutrition management of prematurely born infants administered until they can feed orally.
Prior studies have reported inadequate enteral nutrition to be a barrier to discharge from the hospital in moderately preterm infants. Earlier introduction of oral feeding is demonstrated to accelerate the achievement of full feeding [11, 15]. The referred studies did not specify if the feedings were supplemented as only orogastric (OG) or as combined OG and oral or whether the OG feedings were provided as continuous, bolus or mixed methods. We examined the catch-up growth to term body weight as an indicator of postnatal growth for the first time and demonstrated that this process is enhanced by the acquisition of full enteral oral and combined gastric and oral feedings but not by bolus gastric feeding. Oral nipple feeding is physiological, unlike orogastric tube feeding, and is reported to induce local gastrointestinal hormones and contribute to the system’s functional and anatomical development [16]. Nonnutritive sucking is demonstrated to facilitate the transition from gavage to full oral feeding and reduce the duration of hospitalization [17]. Our results might indirectly highlight the beneficial effects of nutritive suck-and-swallow activities on postnatal growth, which are recruited during nipple feeding but bypassed by gastric bolus feeding. Our results have suggested that it may be safe to start nipple feeding at 32 weeks of post-menstrual age (PMA) in clinically stable VPN who have no significant apnea, bradycardia or desaturation at rest or during nonnutritive sucking, which is a week earlier than the currently practiced 33–34 weeks of PMA [11,18]. The introduction of nipple feeding at 32 weeks of post-menstrual age (PMA) [11,18] did not result in any significant adverse or untoward events. The reported fetal maturational age for the suck-swallow function is 33–34 weeks. Premature birth may enhance the timeline of developmental milestones and modify the trajectory of maturational processes in neonates compared to the fetus. Brumbaugh et al. introduced oral feeding at 33.9 weeks of postmenstrual age and demonstrated that the earlier start of oral feeds by one week reduces the time taken to achieve full feeding by 4–5 days [11]. The total number of infants born between 28–33 weeks of gestation in the year 2015 was 107,538 in the USA [19], and the average total cost of care was reported as 114,437 for those who weighed <2500 g at birth [20]. If clinically permissible, deliberate initiation of nipple feeding at 32 weeks of postmenstrual age may be safe and successful in stable neonates and diminish their duration of hospitalization and cost of care.
We identified the intake of antibiotics as an independent risk factor for prolonged hospitalization in very preterm neonates. In their evaluation of over 14,000 infants, Ting et al. concluded that prolonged empirical use of antibiotics in preterm infants is associated with increased odds of the composite outcome of death, BPD, NEC, retinopathy of prematurity, hospital-acquired infection and neurological injury [21]. They did not evaluate LOH [21]. Neonatal morbidities, namely respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), are known to delay hospital discharge in VPN [12]. These illnesses have signs and symptoms common to sepsis and are often associated with infection, for which they receive antibiotics. Our results support identifying and implementing quality improvement measures to limit the use of antibiotics in managing neonatal illnesses and exercise antibiotics stewardship. The judicious use of antibiotics and improved feeding strategies could shorten the LOH in preterm neonates.
Strengths and weaknesses
This is a single-center retrospective study, and the number of included infants is not large, although the statistical significance of the results suggests adequacy of power. We investigated exclusively the bolus orogastric feeding method and the postnatal catch-up to term as a growth variable, unlike past reports. The association of antibiotic use with prolonged hospitalization in very premature infants was not documented before. Our infants were fed via an orogastric tube; therefore, the results do not apply to the nasogastric feeding practice. A Cochran review reported no difference between nasogastric and orogastric gavage methods in the time taken to achieve full feeding [22, 23]. The results of our study demonstrate associations and do not ascribe to cause-and-effect relationships between feeding practices and the tested outcomes.
Conclusions
Oral nipple feeding with bottle is independently associated with accelerated postnatal catch-up growth and shortened duration of hospitalization in very preterm infants. Bolus orogastric feeding does not demonstrate such associations unless combined with oral nipple feeding to provide enteral nutrition. The relations between bolus orogastric feeding and postnatal growth and hospitalization duration, although statistically highly significant, are weak and not translatable to independent clinical significance. Nipple feeding may be successfully introduced at 32 weeks of postmenstrual age under close watch in clinically stable very preterm neonates. The use of antibiotics is associated with prolonged hospitalization and should be carefully limited in these infants.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Als H Brazelton TBA new model of assessing the behavioral organization in preterm and full-term infants: two case studies J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 19812022396310.1016/s 0002-7138(09)60987-07196421 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Mizuno K Ueda A The maturation and coordination of sucking, swallowing, and respiration in preterm infants J Pediatr 20031421364010.1067/mpd.2003.mpd 031212520252 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Lau C Development of infant oral feeding skills: what do we know?Am J Clin Nutr Epub 2016 Jan 202016 Na N 1032616 S 21S 10.3945/ajcn.115.10960326791183 PMC 4733254 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gewolb IH Vice FL Abnormalities in the coordination of respiration and swallow in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia Dev Med Child Neurol 2006 Na N 487595910.1017/S 001216220600124116780630 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Hay WW Jr Lucas A Heird WC Ziegler E Levin E Grave GD Catz CS Yaffe SJ Workshop summary: nutrition of the extremely low birth weight infant Pediatrics 199910461360810.1542/peds.104.6.136010585989 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Schanler RJ Garza C Nichols BL Fortified mothers’ milk for very low birth weight infants: results of growth and nutrient balance studies J Pediatr 1985 Na N 10734374510.1016/s 0022-3476(85)80531-x 4032137 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Butte NF Garza C Smith EO Nichols BL Human milk intake and growth in exclusively breast-fed infants J Pediatr 1984 Na N 10421879510.1016/s 0022-3476(84)80990-76694010 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Trapnell TL Rogers CE Neil JJ Inder TE Woodward LJ Pineda RG Factors associated with feeding difficulties in the very preterm infant Acta Paediatr 201310212 e 539e 54510.1111/apa.1239323952198 PMC 3873367 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗