Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Monotherapy vs. Warfarin and Aspirin for Adult Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Meta-Analysis
Revanth Reddy Bandaru, Anurag Rawat, Illahay Jalali, Abraham K Isaak, Alahed A Alrahahleh, Sohaib M Bataineh, Calvin R Wei, Shamsha Hirani

TL;DR
This study compares warfarin alone versus warfarin plus aspirin in patients with heart pumps, finding similar risks of blood clots and deaths but fewer bleeding events with warfarin alone.
Contribution
This meta-analysis provides new evidence on the safety and efficacy of dual versus single anticoagulant therapy in LVAD patients.
Findings
Warfarin monotherapy was associated with significantly fewer bleeding events compared to warfarin plus aspirin.
There was no significant difference in thrombotic events or all-cause mortality between the two treatment groups.
The study highlights the need for cautious decision-making regarding aspirin discontinuation in LVAD patients.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of warfarin plus aspirin versus warfarin monotherapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). The present meta-analysis was conducted using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two authors systematically searched online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to December 31, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included any thrombotic event, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. A total of five articles were included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a pooled sample size of 876 patients, including 405 in the warfarin monotherapy group and 471 in the warfarin plus aspirin group. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of thrombotic events was not significantly different between the two…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair · Heart Failure Treatment and Management
