RETRACTED: Systematic Review of Fatal Sodium Nitrite Ingestion Cases: Toxicological and Forensic Implications

TL;DR

This retracted review examines fatal sodium nitrite poisonings, highlighting the need for better detection methods and public health measures.

Contribution

The paper systematically reviews forensic and toxicological challenges in sodium nitrite poisoning cases.

Findings

Most studies were case reports, with 53 fatal sodium nitrite intoxication cases reviewed.

Current diagnostic methods lack uniform cutoffs for blood nitrite and nitrate levels.

More research is needed on other matrices and the impact of postmortem time on results.

Abstract

Documented cases of sodium nitrite toxicity are almost exclusively caused by accidental ingestion; however, self-poisoning with sodium nitrite represents an increasing trend in nitrate-related deaths. This systematic review summarizes the most crucial evidence regarding the fatal toxicity of sodium nitrite. It identifies gaps and differences in the diagnostic forensic approaches and the detection methods of sodium nitrite intoxication. A total of eleven research articles were selected for qualitative and quantitative data. Most of the studies (6/11) were case reports. Fifty-three cases of fatal intoxication with sodium nitrite were chosen for the review. More research is required to develop cost-effective techniques and uniform cutoffs for blood nitrite and nitrate levels in the event of deadly sodium nitrite poisoning. There is still a lack of critical information on other matrices and the impact of time since death on toxicological results in such situations. The available evidence provides useful recommendations for forensic pathologists and health practitioners engaged in instances of sodium nitrite poisoning or death. The data should also set off alarm bells in the public health system, in prosecutor’s offices, and for policymakers so that they may undertake preventative measures to stop and restrict the unregulated market for these substances.

Full text

1. Introduction

Sodium nitrite (NaNO_2_) is a water-soluble, white-yellow-colored crystalline powder with various practical applications, including food preservatives, antimicrobials, and coloring agents [1,2]. It is also a corrosion inhibitor found in antifreeze in pharmaceuticals and an antidote for cyanide poisoning [3,4].

Sodium nitrite acts by interfering with red blood cells binding to oxygen. The iron component of hemoglobin becomes oxidized from ferrous iron (Fe^2+^) to ferric iron (Fe^3+^), converting hemoglobin to methemoglobin [5]. Methemoglobin cannot bind oxygen, impairing oxygen transport and causing subsequent hypoxia and lactic acidosis. Circulatory dysfunction is further compounded by hemolysis and the peripheral vasodilatory action of sodium nitrite (as a precursor of nitric oxide), inducing circulatory shock [6,7]. As such, preexisting cardiovascular disease and anemia are conditions that will exacerbate toxicity [8,9]. The physical symptoms of sodium nitrite poisoning vary depending on the concentration of methemoglobin but first become evident at levels of approximately 35%, including fatigue, difficulty/irregular breathing, tachycardia, impaired mental status, nausea, and vomiting. At above 50%, patients develop symptoms of severe tissue hypoxia such as cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, coma, and death [10,11]. If not treated, this condition can be fatal in severe cases.

Documented cases of sodium nitrite toxicity are almost exclusively caused by accidental ingestion; however, self-poisoning with sodium nitrite represents an increasing trend in nitrate-related deaths [12,13]. A similar trend has recently been reported in the United States (US) [14,15], Portugal [16], and the Republic of Korea [17].

To reach a precise diagnosis of NaNO_2_ intoxication, a complete toxicological analysis should be carried out, including MetHb blood levels and nitrite and nitrate content in standard or alternative matrices as a routine procedure. The autopsy should be carefully performed to detect common indicators of hypoxia or nonspecific signs of sodium nitrite toxicity. However, sodium nitrite intoxication is still an open challenge, given the variety of detection methods and different diagnostic algorithms in use in various forensic settings [18]. In this regard, this systematic review summarizes the most crucial evidence regarding the fatal toxicity of sodium nitrite. It identifies gaps and differences in the diagnostic forensic approaches and the detection methods of sodium nitrite intoxication.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Information Sources and Search Strategy

The present systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) [19,20,21] using the methodology described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook on Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Program [22,23]. The Prisma checklist has been followed for this systematic review. The data for this systematic review were gathered by searching for the articles reported in the literature in PubMed and Scopus (January 2000–December 2022). The search strategy mainly focused on articles based on autopsy diagnoses of fatal sodium nitrite intoxication. For the search, MeSH terms and free text words were combined through Boolean operators as follows: ((autopsy) OR (death) OR (suicide) OR (intoxication) OR (poison) OR (fatal)) AND ((sodium nitrite) OR (nitrite) OR (NaNO2) OR (nitrate)).

2.2. Study Identification and Selection

Abstracts and full-text articles found in the preliminary search were retrieved. Nonelectronic searching, such as handsearching for related journals and articles, was conducted along with electronic searching. The data required for this systematic review were selected in two stages. In the first stage, the articles were selected based on the title and references to the abstracts related to our research question. The preliminary search mainly yielded 1032 articles suitable for the aim of this systematic review. Two hundred were disregarded because of the duplication of the data. Thus 832 articles were recovered for the second stage of data selection. The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the remaining articles.

2.3. Eligibility Criteria for the Studies

2.3.1. Inclusion Criteria

The article was in English.The article was original.The study involved human autopsies with data regarding fatal sodium nitrite intoxication (independently of the manner of death) and toxicological findings.

2.3.2. Exclusion Criteria

Articles not concerning autopsy and toxicological findings in fatal sodium nitrite intoxication.Articles with only abstracts and no full text.Articles in languages other than English.Reviews, posters, abstracts, communications at conferences, and commentaries.In vivo and animal studies.

2.4. Data Extraction and Management

After applying these eligibility criteria, the number of articles was further reduced to 11 (Figure 1) studies, which were deemed eligible for the qualitative analysis [15,16,17,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The risk of bias evaluation and the applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies was carried out using the updated QUADAS (Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy) version, the QUADAS-2 tool, as recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Cochrane Collaboration [22,23].

The quality of each study was evaluated independently by two authors. If there was a conflict of opinion regarding the articles, they were submitted to another author. Finally, 11 articles were included in the current review. For each study, three authors extracted the following data using a predesigned data extraction Excel sheet. Study characteristics (name of the first author, year of publication, name of the country where the study was performed), sample characteristics (number of cases, age, gender, crime scene findings)), methodology and toxicological findings (toxicological analysis technique, main toxicological findings, and types of drugs detected), and autopsy findings (livor mortis) were collected when present.

2.5. Risk of Bias Assessment and Applicability Concerns

The risk of bias assessment led to the classification of all included studies as reporting a low risk of bias in terms of patients’ selection since all included patients fitted the diagnostic framework of sodium nitrite poisoning (Supplementary Table S1). Similar results were obtained from the flow and timing of the tests’ performance, leading to the classification of the available evidence as low risk. In terms of “index test” and “reference standard domain,” uncertainty was reported as the result of the significant heterogeneity in daily clinical practice in defining diagnostic pathways of sodium nitrite poisoning, which led us to focus on this topic through a systematic review of the available evidence. Focusing on the applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies, both index text and reference standard were reported as low risk because in forensic practice, the diagnosis of sodium nitrite poisoning, although with the reported limitations, has acceptable accuracy (Supplementary Table S1). According to QUADAS recommendations [23], applicability concerns sections are structured similarly to the bias section, but differently from the risk of bias section and do not include signaling questions (Supplementary Table S1).

3. Results

A Qualitative and Quantitative Synthesis of the Included Studies

A total of eleven research articles were selected for qualitative and quantitative data. Most of the studies (6/11) were case reports. Fifty-three cases of fatal intoxication with sodium nitrite were chosen for the review. Most fatalities involved men (41/53, 77.3%) under fifty years old (41/53, 77.3%). Except for three cases (1 accidental ingestion/2 undetermined), the manner of sodium nitrite consumption was suicidal (Figure 2). In forty cases (75.4%), no information about the postmortem interval was present in the manuscript. An alteration in the color of the livor mortis was observed in thirty-six patients (67.9%). The most frequent autopsy findings were not specific: congestion, brain and pulmonary edema, and cyanosis. The crime scene was suggestive of sodium nitrite intoxication in most cases. According to Cvetkovic [31], there was no evidence at the crime scene of sodium nitrite consumption. However, there was a positive history of the consumption of homemade sausage, and the toxicological analysis showed that the concentration of sodium nitrite in food was almost 30 times higher than what is allowed according to the legislation. Furthermore, the only specific and frequent findings at autopsy consisted of typical livor mortis color detection (blue, gray) (Table 1).

In 52/53 (98.11%), blood was the selected matrix for toxicological analysis (Met Hb, nitrite, and nitrate levels); other samples have also been used for analysis—such as urine (15/53, 28.30%), gastric content (42/53, 79.24%), CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) (1/53, 1.88%), pericardial fluid (1/53, 1.88%), kidney (1/53, 1.88%), liver (1/53, 1.88%), vitreous humor (1/53, 1.88%), and costal cartilage (1/53, 1.88%) (Table 2).

In thirty-one cases (31/53, 58.49%), the toxicological methodologies applied were not specified; gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry were performed in ten cases (Table 3).

The most frequent toxicological analysis performed was the determination of the level of methemoglobin (32/53, 60.37%), followed by nitrite (19/53, 35.84%) and nitrate content (11/53, 20.75%). Toxicological analyses were not performed for methemoglobin in 20 cases, for nitrite in 33 cases, and for nitrate in 41 cases. The toxicological analysis was also performed in one case that was not specified (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The eleven selected papers illustrate the fifty-three fatality cases linked to sodium nitrite poisoning. They include autopsies and toxicological results. The phenomenon is becoming more and more widespread, and the studies that have been chosen provide a glimpse of the situation on four distinct continents: Europe (7/11 studies), America (2/11 studies), Asia (1 study), and Australia (1 study). The review’s results and literature data [30] show how sodium nitrite misuse is a pertinent global public health concern that needs to be discussed. Its usage is becoming more and more common for suicide purposes.

Sodium nitrite is an inorganic compound that, at environmental temperature, has a crystalline, odorless, yellowish-white, water-soluble, and hygroscopic appearance. The substance has applications in many different sectors and is known for being easily accessible. It is primarily used as a treatment for cyanide poisoning, although it is a very rare procedure and a cyanide antidote kit is not widely available [31]. In the food industry, it is used as a preservative (labeled with the code “E250”) in meat products to inhibit bacterial growth, stop deterioration, and improve organoleptic qualities (appearance, color, and taste through a reaction with myoglobin [32]. International governmental organizations have limited this preservative over time to safeguard human health and food safety due to its dose-dependent toxicity [33,34,35]. However, regarding trading, the same limitations have not been implemented. This chemical compound is still readily available today, even online. Our data indicate that its gradual and abrupt expansion as a suicide method has been made possible by its simple availability and low cost, even among young individuals of both sexes. Most of the chosen cases include circumstantial evidence and scene discoveries pointing to suicide attempts and nitrite intake. To support the deadly sodium nitrite intoxication theory, further investigations should be directed toward the death scene, evidence of white powder, a bottle of water next to the body, websites, or instructions regarding sodium nitrite. To properly handle these instances, patient anamnesis is also crucial. Low-grade methemoglobinemia has a wide range of symptoms and warning signals [36].

In the absence of coexisting cardiovascular or respiratory problems, patients are often asymptomatic when MetHb is less than 20%. Cyanosis might be recognized when the MetHb ranges from 10% to 20%. Blood becomes chocolate brown at roughly 15% to 20% concentrations [37]. Before the skin and nails change color, this trait can be found in a therapeutic environment. Hypoxia symptoms start to appear at levels of roughly 35%. Both muscular weakness and exhaustion affect patients. A heme subunit can be found in myoglobin, a muscle protein. This component can bind one molecule of oxygen. When nitrites are present, myoglobin found in muscle can oxidize similarly to Hb, losing some of its ability to bind oxygen. As a result, muscular hypoxia develops, and patients may experience fatigue, lassitude, and cramping. The coroner needs to pay close attention to the patient’s psychiatric history, prior suicide attempts that would have pointed in that direction, and any assumptions about using sodium nitrite in a suicide attempt [38,39,40,41,42]. It is critical to analyze these parameters to identify the potential victim of sodium nitrite poisoning and to support toxicological and postmortem investigations. The selected studies demonstrate that a death scene is often crucial to indicate the suspicion of sodium nitrite-related fatality.

The usual blue-brown-gray hue of livor is sometimes the only characteristic present and it shows high variability in the included studies. Another potential MetHb signal discovered during autopsy dissection is the blood’s uneven brown color. According to Hickey et al. [27], this was an uncommon finding in the postmortem reports for our cases. It is unclear if this results from the phenomenon being subtle and not regularly appreciated by forensic pathologists or if this is simply because the descriptions of the postmortem reports are not routinely included.

According to Bugelli et al. [24], typically reported hypoxic cyanotic alterations of the fingers and toes are evident. The submitted data also demonstrate that typical postmortem findings include pulmonary edema and congestion, which are particular asphyxial symptoms. As previously stated, the definitive diagnosis of sodium nitrite intoxication-related mortality can only be made after a thorough toxicological analysis, which must be targeted by a comprehensive examination of the patient’s medical history and circumstantial evidence [39,40,41,42,43]. The presented cases underscore the significance of autopsy in revealing indicators of fatal sodium nitrite intoxication. Among these indicators are the discernible skin color changes due to hypostasis and alterations in blood coloration. Additionally, the study reveals familiar yet nonspecific signs, including visceral congestion, pulmonary edema, and a bluish tinge in the nail beds. Consequently, the autopsy examination proves to be important in instances of suspected sodium nitrite poisoning and cases where contextual information, the death scene, and medical history collectively point to such a scenario. Notably, the autopsy also serves the dual purpose of ruling out alternative pathological causes and securing biological samples for subsequent toxicological analyses. Therefore, its role is strongly recommended and indispensable in the diagnostic process.

The most frequent toxicological approach to suggest sodium nitrite toxicity was methemoglobin detection in blood. Due to methodological variability in the available research, it took a lot of work to analyze the toxicity data. Despite the variations, blood and stomach contents were the most often employed matrices for MHb, nitrite, and nitrate analyses. Urine, cerebral fluid, vitreous humor, pericardial fluid, and other samples (including those from the liver, kidney, intestinal content, and costal cartilage) were rarely collected and analyzed. Notably, it became clear that only a tiny fraction of cases conducted a direct search for nitrites, which is different from a typical examination. Numerous biological matrices may be utilized for this evaluation. Still, the two most frequently employed are stomach contents and blood (for the techniques of ingestion and the entrance of the agent into circulation, respectively). Even while doses around 70% are typically lethal, concentrations that are not too far outside the normal range make it impossible to rule out sodium nitrite as the cause of death, especially when comorbid conditions are present. Studies in the literature conducted on living people demonstrate that the proportion of residual oxyhemoglobin in the clinical situation only indicates a theoretical capacity for oxygen transport since it is also required to consider adequate tissue release capacity [44,45].

A reduced capacity to transport oxygen and a lower ability to release it are highly impacted by allosteric changes in MHb. Nevertheless, it is not easy to pinpoint the MHb concentration, particularly in postmortem investigations [24]. As a result, forensic pathologists often take into account a causative relationship between consuming sodium nitrite and mortality even for lower MHb values, provided that this link is supported by other evidence, as in other cases [46,47,48,49].

The endogenous concentration of nitrite in the blood is low. Moreover, nitrites are oxidized to nitrates in whole blood. Therefore, the postmortem interval influences nitrites, nitrates, and methemoglobin concentration in blood samples, as suggested by previous studies [24,27,49,50]. However, further research is needed to confirm this evidence, especially for nitrites and nitrates postmortem redistribution. The literature data confirm that storage time, quality of blood (related to postmortem interval and the degree of putrefaction), and the temperature of storage can affect the postmortem concentration of MetHb [51,52,53,54]. In this regard, it is advisable to avoid the analysis of blood samples of suboptimal quality resulting from delays, sample heating, or putrefaction. The examination of such samples should be avoided as the altered state of the blood may introduce optical artifacts during CO-oximetry or spectrophotometry measurements, thereby leading to inaccurate MetHb estimations. In cases where the precision of blood storage conditions is not guaranteed, it is recommended to concurrently conduct postmortem MetHb assessments along with blood and urine nitrate/nitrite measurements. Caution should be exercised in interpreting MetHb variations that do not align with nitrate/nitrite fluctuations as an elevation in MetHb levels may be attributed to autoxidation, while a reduction in MetHb levels may result from MetHb reductase activity [24,27,49,50]. A recent study [50] demonstrated that MetHb measurement remains unaffected by the anatomical source of blood. In the context of the same body under consideration, MetHb saturation appears consistent between cardiac and peripheral blood, irrespective of postmortem delay and storage conditions. Nevertheless, as the storage delay prior to analysis, as well as the occurrence of opening/closing and freezing/thawing cycles, increases for both blood types, the blood’s condition poses challenges for obtaining accurate optical measurements through a CO-oximeter due to the generation of artifacts. Moreover, nitrite concentration is not influenced by the anatomical source of the blood. Indeed, nitrite in whole blood is rapidly oxidized to nitrate by hemoglobin in erythrocytes (>95% in 1 h) independently of the site of the blood sample [51,52]

In contrast, the nitrate concentrations in whole blood samples from nitrite poisoning cases were high in the presented cases, considering that the endogenous nitrate concentrations are known to be below ten mg/L. The ingestion of nitrate-rich vegetables can influence nitrate concentration in blood samples by increasing the plasma nitrate level by approximately ninefold, with the highest reported peak level being 60 mg/L [30]. However, the endogenous nitrate levels are still significantly lower compared with those of nitrite poisoning cases [54,55] Therefore, high nitrate concentrations can be considered a marker of nitrite poisoning and need to be considered for toxicological analysis in the case of sodium nitrite intoxication suspicion [47,48,49].

In most of the studies, there is no distinction between separation techniques and detection methods, and hyphenated techniques are described. The selected research studies indicate that the primary methods employed to assess nitrate and nitrite levels in biological samples associated with sodium nitrite poisoning predominantly involve ion chromatography and spectrophotometric analysis using the Griess method [16,29,30]. Nevertheless, the Griess method, while cost-effective and readily accessible, presents several drawbacks and limitations. As one of the earliest and most acknowledged approaches for evaluating nitrate and nitrite levels [56], the Griess colorimetric assay has evolved over time, giving rise to various alternative versions. The prevailing technique involves the diazotization reaction of nitrite with sulfanilamide, followed by coupling with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine. The resulting azo compound absorbs radiation at around 540 nm in the visible range [56]. The batch spectrophotometric approach is simple and readily achievable, with derivatization reagents available in user-friendly, ready-to-use kits designed for this purpose [56,57,58]. However, its sensitivity is relatively modest, and obtaining precise results depends on thorough sample purification. Complex biological matrices contain numerous compounds that induce turbidity, sample absorption, and interference with detection. For example, hemoglobin in hemolyzed blood strongly absorbs radiation at 540 nm. Moreover, endogenous compounds can negatively influence the derivatization reaction, posing a risk of false-negative results [56,57,58].

The batch Griess assay is recognized for being one of the quickest, simplest, and most cost-effective methods for determining nitrate and nitrite contents, and it is frequently chosen in cases of fatal poisoning [16,29,30]. Nevertheless, caution is essential as this method tends to yield different results compared with more reliable reference techniques, such as those based on mass spectrometry. Therefore, it should be used discerningly, with a preference for more dependable techniques whenever feasible [56,59].

A more promising alternative is ion chromatography (IC), which eliminates the need for intricate reduction and derivatization processes. IC excels in simultaneously analyzing multiple anions in both simple and complex matrices, making it a common choice for investigating nitrates and nitrites in poisoning cases, as illustrated in the selected studies [17,24]. Unfortunately, IC is not universally established or available in all forensic toxicology laboratories.

In forensic toxicology, mass spectrometry remains the benchmark and the most widely embraced analytical technique for detecting toxic substances [60,61]. A significant advantage of mass spectrometry methods is the ability to perform quantitative measurements using internal standards in the form of isotopically labeled analogs of the substances of interest. The inclusion of commercially available nitrite and nitrate salts as internal standards into biological material streamlines the analytical process and ensures reliable results. These standards undergo identical transformations and processes (extraction, derivatization, reduction, and chromatographic separation) as naturally occurring nitrates and nitrites throughout the analytical process [62,63].

Direct analysis of these anions by GC–MS is unfeasible. However, two primary derivatization techniques yield thermally stable and volatile products suitable for analysis through this method: nitration and alkylation with pentafluorobenzyl bromide (PFB-Br). The nitration method relies on the nitrate-specific reaction of an aromatic compound with a nitrate anion under acidic conditions [18,62,63]. A significant drawback of this method is the use of concentrated sulfuric acid as a catalyst, with studies indicating positive interference in nitrate determination due to the decomposition and release of nitrate from endogenous compounds in the plasma, such as various nitroso compounds [18,62,63]. Moreover, working with concentrated sulfuric acid demands careful handling due to the release of substantial heat in addition to the aqueous phase.

In the cases under examination, the blood concentrations of methemoglobin, nitrites, and nitrates exhibited significant variability. It is important to note that laboratories employ differing units of measurement for nitrite and nitrate concentrations, further complicating direct comparisons. Given the nature of these fatalities stemming from acute sodium nitrite intoxication, deriving definitive reference ranges and specific toxicity cutoffs from the scrutinized studies remains elusive. The recorded nitrite concentrations in blood ranged from 0.03 to 35 µg/mL, while nitrates spanned from 91 to 460 µg/mL. Methemoglobinemia displayed fluctuations between 30 and 70% mostly. Notably, a methemoglobin level surpassing 3% serves as an indicator of potential nitrite exposure [54,55,64]. It is pertinent to acknowledge the potential influence of postmortem processes on the production of these compounds, a factor greatly affected by the postmortem interval. In six of the presented studies, the postmortem interval and the time between death and autopsy were not reported, limiting important considerations. A recent study confirmed that there is no available theoretical or evidential information regarding postmortem redistribution of either sodium nitrite or nitrate; the nitrite’s volume of distribution is reported to be 0.2–0.5 L/kg [65]. It is documented that nitrite undergoes nearly complete conversion to nitrate in whole blood within an hour. The body’s half-life for nitrite falls within the range of 30–50 min [65]. The conventional method for assessing sodium nitrite poisoning cases involves postmortem measurement of MetHb concentration. However, relying solely on methemoglobinemia to ascertain the cause of poisoning is not advisable due to its association with various other substances, and the determination of MetHb itself may present challenges. Moreover, reported MetHb concentrations in fatal poisoning cases vary widely, frequently falling below the minimum reference lethal saturation of 60% as described in the literature [18,66,67,68]

Multiple studies have illustrated that the ingestion of dietary nitrate leads to statistically significant increases in circulating nitrite concentrations. Nevertheless, it has been noted that a tenfold rise in circulating nitrate levels achieved through dietary intake results in only an approximately twofold increase in circulating nitrite concentrations [65]. Hence, it seems highly improbable that typical dietary nitrate intake would result in the significantly elevated nitrite and nitrate levels observed in postmortem blood samples. Sodium nitrite misuse for suicide purposes is widespread with no significant data in the literature about the different geographical distribution of such phenomenon. Sodium nitrite poisoning was virtually unheard of until very recently. However, the number of cases has significantly increased over the last several years. The trend appears to be driven by online forums detailing how to dose sodium nitrite for suicide [67,68]. The emergence of the internet, coupled with the changing dynamics of society and lifestyle patterns, has led to a diversification of suicide methods over time. There is a noticeable upward trend in specific cases documented in the literature, highlighting the rapid and diffuse dissemination of novel suicide methods [69].

To enhance the precision and reliability of these analyses, further exploration through clinical and experimental studies is imperative. These efforts should aim to standardize investigation methodologies and results interpretation and establish comprehensive guidelines for accurate assessments in cases of sodium nitrite intoxication. Not all facilities have the state-of-the-art equipment needed to detect nitrite and nitrate concentrations in human samples, as some of the cases presented have shown. Toxicological investigations and the execution of the autopsy in the event of death from suspected sodium nitrite intoxication must, therefore, be entrusted to reference centers and multidisciplinary teams capable of detecting the concentration of nitrites and nitrates and correctly interpreting the results of the analyses.

It is crucial to address the biases and assess the quality of the collected studies, predominantly composed of case reports and case series. Regarding biases, several inherent limitations need consideration. Publication bias may be a concern where positive or unique cases are more likely to be reported, potentially skewing the overall perspective on the occurrence of fatal sodium nitrite intoxication. Furthermore, selection bias could emerge due to the nature of case reports and series, which inherently involve a non-randomized sampling of cases. This can lead to an overrepresentation of atypical or severe cases, thus impacting the generalizability of findings. Reporting bias might also be present as crucial details could be omitted or underreported, affecting the accuracy of the synthesized information. Assessing the quality of these studies entails recognizing their inherent limitations. Case reports and case series lack the rigorous experimental design of controlled studies, making them prone to bias and confounding factors. The absence of a comparison group limits the ability to establish causal relationships or draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, variations in data collection, diagnostic criteria, and reporting methods across different reports could compromise the consistency and reliability of the evidence.

The diagnosis of sodium nitrite poisoning for the instances described was made using a range of data from the decedent’s history, death scene, autopsy, and toxicological and biochemistry findings, sometimes in the absence of a conclusive quantitative diagnostic test. To properly detect these cases at presentation and autopsy, health providers and pathologists must be aware of growing deadly drug usage patterns, clinical symptoms, and scene and postmortem findings [60,69]. This is especially true in situations when standard toxicological procedures might not be available. When a deadly sodium nitrite poisoning is suspected, a multidisciplinary and comprehensive strategy is required.

5. Conclusions

The revision showed the autopsy and toxicological findings of the most updated literature about fatal sodium nitrite intoxication. It is important to highlight the need for more research on cadavers by making the presumption that sodium nitrite was present during the anamnesis and assessment of the death scene. Furthermore, while clinical cases employ a range of methods, only a limited set has been executed and validated for postmortem material of forensic significance. This underscores the need to develop techniques that are accessible, cost-effective, and reliable. To determine the reason and manner of death, a multidisciplinary approach and communication between the laboratory and pathologist are required. Not every facility has the tools required for nitrate and nitrite detection. More research is required to develop cost-effective techniques and uniform cutoffs for blood nitrite and nitrate levels in the event of deadly sodium nitrite poisoning. There is still a lack of critical information on other matrices and the impact of time since death on toxicological results in such situations. The available evidence provides useful recommendations for forensic pathologists and health practitioners engaged in instances of sodium nitrite poisoning or death. The data should also sound alarm bells in the public health system and prosecutor’s offices and for policymakers so that they may undertake preventative measures to stop and restrict the unregulated market for these substances.