Increased reliance on temporal coding when target sound is softer than the background

TL;DR

The study shows that when sounds are soft compared to background noise, the brain relies more on timing of neural signals to detect sounds.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates that temporal coding, not spike rate, enables sound detection across varying noise levels.

Findings

Rate-based decoding fails at negative SNRs, while temporal coding remains effective.

Trained gerbils show SNR-invariant tone detection using temporal spike patterns.

Temporal fine structure resolution correlates with dip-listening performance.

Abstract

Everyday environments often contain multiple concurrent sound sources that fluctuate over time. Normally hearing listeners can benefit from high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in energetic dips of temporally fluctuating background sound, a phenomenon called dip-listening. Specialized mechanisms of dip-listening exist across the entire auditory pathway. Both the instantaneous fluctuating and the long-term overall SNR shape dip-listening. An unresolved issue regarding cortical mechanisms of dip-listening is how target perception remains invariant to overall SNR, specifically, across different tone levels with an ongoing fluctuating masker. Equivalent target detection over both positive and negative overall SNRs (SNR invariance) is reliably achieved in highly-trained listeners. Dip-listening is correlated with the ability to resolve temporal fine structure, which involves temporally-varying spike patterns. Thus the current work tests the hypothesis that at negative SNRs, neuronal readout mechanisms need to increasingly rely on decoding strategies based on temporal spike patterns, as opposed to spike count. Recordings from chronically implanted electrode arrays in core auditory cortex of trained and awake Mongolian gerbils that are engaged in a tone detection task in 10 Hz amplitude-modulated background sound reveal that rate-based decoding is not SNR-invariant, whereas temporal coding is informative at both negative and positive SNRs.

Figures