# Anti-CGRP and Anti-CGRP Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prophylaxis: Retrospective Observational Study on 209 Patients

**Authors:** Vittorio Schweiger, Paola Bellamoli, Francesco Taus, Leonardo Gottin, Alvise Martini, Marta Nizzero, Eleonora Bonora, Giovanna Del Balzo, Katia Donadello, Erica Secchettin, Gabriele Finco, Daniele De Santis, Enrico Polati

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041130 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2024-02-17

## TL;DR

This study examines the effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptor monoclonal antibodies in treating migraine in 209 patients.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP therapies for migraine.

## Key findings

- Erenumab and galcanezumab showed statistically significant improvements in migraine outcomes.
- Only 2.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events.
- 17.5% of patients reported adverse events, but most continued treatment.

## Abstract

Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with migraine and who were prescribed, between 2019 and 2022, subcutaneous injections of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) fremanezumab or galcanezumab or anti-CGRP receptors mAb erenumab regardless of the concomitant assumption of any other acute-phase or prophylactic migraine medication. Results: Regarding efficacy, in the 205 analyzed patients, the change from baseline in terms of MIDAS, HIT-6, MMDs and MAD scores was statistically significant for erenumab and galcanezumab, while for fremanezumab a statistical significance was not achieved likely due to the small sample size. In the treated population, 36 patients (17.5%) reported AEs (pain during injection, transient injection site erythema, nausea, constipation and fatigue). Only 5 patients (2.4%) discontinued the treatment for AEs while 15 patients (7.3%) left for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: this retrospective study comes out in favor of both significant efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptors mAbs in migraine patients. Further methodologically stronger studies are necessary to validate our observation.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** CALCA (calcitonin related polypeptide alpha)
- **Diseases:** migraine (MONDO:0005277)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CALCA (calcitonin related polypeptide alpha) [NCBI Gene 796] {aka CALC1, CGRP, CGRP-I, CGRP-alpha, CGRP1, CT}
- **Diseases:** neurological disorder (MESH:D009461), erythema (MESH:D004890), constipation (MESH:D003248), Migraine (MESH:D008881), head pain (MESH:D006261), nausea (MESH:D009325), pain (MESH:D010146), fatigue (MESH:D005221)
- **Chemicals:** galcanezumab (MESH:C000628360), fremanezumab (MESH:C000604315), erenumab (MESH:C000605816)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10889238/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10889238/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10889238/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10889238