Electrocardiography versus Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with the Consideration of Coexistent Coronary Artery Disease

TL;DR

This study compares ECG and echocardiography for detecting heart issues in patients with aortic stenosis and finds that ECG is not very reliable.

Contribution

The study evaluates the impact of coronary artery disease on ECG's ability to detect left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic stenosis patients.

Findings

ECG-LVH was detected in 47.3% of patients, but sensitivity was low compared to echocardiography.

Coronary artery disease did not significantly affect ECG or echocardiography results for left ventricular hypertrophy.

Only weak correlations were found between ECG parameters and left ventricular mass index.

Abstract

(1) Background: Coexistent coronary artery disease (CAD) might influence the ability of electrocardiogram (ECG) to identify echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECHO-LVH) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to assess the relation between ECG–LVH (by the Sokolov–Lyon or Cornell criteria) and ECHO-LVH considering coexistent CAD. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 74 patients (36 males) with severe AS who were hospitalized in the University Hospital in Cracow from 2021 to 2022. (3) Results: ECHO-LVH was present in 49 (66%) patients, whereas 35 (47.3%) patients had ECG-LVH. There was no difference between the rate of ECG-LVH in patients with vs. without ECHO-LVH. Single-vessel and multi-vessel CAD were diagnosed by invasive coronary angiography in 18% and 11% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity of the classical ECG-LVH criteria with regard to ECHO-LVH was low, reaching at best 41% for the Sokolov–Lyon and Cornell criteria. The results were similar and lacked a pattern when considering patients without significant stenosis, with single- and multi-vessel disease separately. Correlations between the left ventricular mass index and ECG-derived parameters were weak and present solely for the Lewis index (r = 0.31), R wave’s amplitude >1.1 mV in aVL (r = 0.36), as well as the Cornell (r = 0.32) and Sokolov–Lyon (r = 0.31) voltage criteria (p < 0.01). The presence, location of stenoses, and CAD extent were not associated with the presence of either ECHO-LVH or ECG-LVH, irrespective of individual ECG-LVH criteria. (4) Conclusions: The sensitivity of classical ECG criteria for echocardiographic LVH in severe AS is low, regardless of coexistent CAD or its angiographic extent.