# Effectiveness of the KC@H programme compared with clinic-based rehabilitation in patients recovering from ACL reconstruction: a study protocol for a single-centre, two-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial

## TL;DR

This study compares a home-based internet program with traditional clinic sessions for recovery after ACL surgery, aiming to see if the home program is more effective.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel home-based rehabilitation program (KC@H) and evaluates its superiority over conventional clinic-based rehabilitation for ACL recovery.

## Key findings

- The KC@H program is expected to improve patient-reported and physical functional outcomes after ACLR.
- The trial will assess if remote sessions can extend rehabilitation reach and improve supervision.
- Findings may influence clinical practice by demonstrating the effectiveness of internet-based rehabilitation.

## Abstract

Patients who cannot fully comply with conventional clinic-based rehabilitation (CR) sessions after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) may find additional internet-based sessions beneficial. These remote sessions include therapeutic exercises that can be done at home, potentially extending the reach of rehabilitation services to underserved areas, prolonging the duration of care and providing improved supervision. The study’s main purpose is to determine if the Knee Care at Home (KC@H) programme is more effective than conventional CR alone in improving patient-reported, clinician-reported and physical functional performance outcome measures after ACLR. Additionally, the trial assesses the significance of changes in outcome measures for clinical practice.

This protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial for postoperative recovery following ACLR. Adult participants of both sexes who meet specific criteria will be randomly assigned to either the CR group or the KC@H group. Only the latter group will receive internet-based sessions of therapeutic exercises at home and CR sessions. A follow-up evaluation will be conducted for both groups 12 weeks after the intervention ends.

The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade de Évora and complies with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. All recordings will be stored on a secure server with limited access and deleted as soon as they are no longer needed.

The KC@H programme is expected to be superior to conventional CR for patients recovering from ACLR across multiple outcome measures. Also, the programme has the potential to promote superior recovery and extend the reach and duration of care.

Trial registration number: NCT05828355.