# Head-to-head comparison of [11C]methionine PET, [11C]choline PET, and 4-dimensional CT as second-line scans for detection of parathyroid adenomas in primary hyperparathyroidism

**Authors:** Milou E. Noltes, Schelto Kruijff, Auke P. A. Appelman, Liesbeth Jansen, Wouter T. Zandee, Thera P. Links, Bettien M. van Hemel, Hugo M. Schouw, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Anne Brecht Francken, Wendy Kelder, Anouk van der Hoorn, Adrienne H. Brouwers

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06488-7 · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2023-11-17

## TL;DR

This study compares three imaging techniques for finding parathyroid tumors when first tests fail, finding that [11C]choline PET/CT is the most effective.

## Contribution

The study provides a direct comparison of [11C]methionine PET, [11C]choline PET, and 4D-CT as second-line imaging techniques for parathyroid adenoma detection.

## Key findings

- [11C]choline PET/CT had the highest lesion-based sensitivity at 85% compared to 67% for [11C]methionine PET/CT and 39% for 4D-CT.
- Blinded evaluation showed [11C]choline PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than the other two techniques.
- 32 parathyroid lesions were confirmed as adenomas through surgery and histopathology.

## Abstract

Accurate preoperative localization is imperative to guide surgery in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). It remains unclear which second-line imaging technique is most effective after negative first-line imaging. In this study, we compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [11C]methionine PET/CT, [11C]choline PET/CT, and four dimensional (4D)-CT head-to-head in patients with pHPT, to explore which of these imaging techniques to use as a second-line scan.

We conducted a powered, prospective, blinded cohort study in patients with biochemically proven pHPT and prior negative or discordant first-line imaging consisting of ultrasonography and 99mTc-sestamibi. All patients underwent [11C]methionine PET/CT, [11C]choline PET/CT, and 4D-CT. At first, all scans were interpreted by a nuclear medicine physician, and a radiologist who were blinded from patient data and all imaging results. Next, a non-blinded scan reading was performed. The scan results were correlated with surgical and histopathological findings. Serum calcium values at least 6 months after surgery were used as gold standard for curation of HPT.

A total of 32 patients were included in the study. With blinded evaluation, [11C]choline PET/CT was positive in 28 patients (88%), [11C]methionine PET/CT in 23 (72%), and 4D-CT in 15 patients (47%), respectively. In total, 30 patients have undergone surgery and 32 parathyroid lesions were histologically confirmed as parathyroid adenomas. Based on the blinded evaluation, lesion-based sensitivity of [11C]choline PET/CT, [11C]methionine PET/CT, and 4D-CT was respectively 85%, 67%, and 39%. The sensitivity of [11C]choline PET/CT differed significantly from that of [11C]methionine PET/CT and 4D-CT (p = 0.031 and p < 0.0005, respectively).

In the setting of pHPT with negative first-line imaging, [11C]choline PET/CT is superior to [11C]methionine PET/CT and 4D-CT in localizing parathyroid adenomas, allowing correct localization in 85% of adenomas. Further studies are needed to determine cost–benefit and efficacy of these scans, including the timing of these scans as first- or second-line imaging techniques.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-023-06488-7.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** [11C]methionine (PubChem CID 11789360), [11C]choline (PubChem CID 449688), 99mTc-sestamibi (PubChem CID 9832136)
- **Diseases:** primary hyperparathyroidism (MONDO:0010837)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** parathyroid lesions (MESH:D010279), adenomas (MESH:D000236), HPT (MESH:C563273), pHPT (MESH:D049950), parathyroid adenomas (MESH:D010282)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10881780/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10881780/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10881780/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10881780