# Effect of simultaneous integrated boost concepts on photoneutron and distant out-of-field doses in VMAT for prostate cancer

**Authors:** Benjamin Gauter-Fleckenstein, Sebastian Schönig, Lena Mertens, Hans Oppitz, Kerstin Siebenlist, Michael Ehmann, Jens Fleckenstein

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02138-x · Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie · 2023-09-14

## TL;DR

This study shows that using a simultaneous integrated boost in prostate cancer radiotherapy can significantly reduce out-of-field and photoneutron radiation doses.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the comparative effect of SIB on photoneutron and out-of-field doses in VMAT for prostate cancer.

## Key findings

- SIB plans reduced photoneutron doses by up to 38.2% in 10-MV treatments.
- FFF mode reduced out-of-field doses by 60% across all scenarios.
- A strong correlation was found between monitor units and both photoneutron and out-of-field doses.

## Abstract

A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) may result in increased out-of-field (DOOF) and photoneutron (HPN) doses in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer (PCA). This work therefore aimed to compare DOOF and HPN in flattened (FLAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) 6‑MV and 10-MV VMAT treatment plans with and without SIB.

Eight groups of 30 VMAT plans for PCA with 6 MV or 10 MV, with or without FF and with uniform (2 Gy) or SIB target dose (2.5/3.0 Gy) prescriptions (CONV, SIB), were generated. All 240 plans were delivered on a slab-phantom and compared with respect to measured DOOF and HPN in 61.8 cm distance from the isocenter. The 6‑ and 10-MV flattened VMAT plans with conventional fractionation (6- and 10-MV FLAT CONV) served as standard reference groups. Doses were analyzed as a function of delivered monitor units (MU) and weighted equivalent square field size Aeq. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the presented quantities were determined.

The SIB plans resulted in decreased HPN over an entire prostate RT treatment course (10-MV SIB vs. CONV −38.2%). Omission of the flattening filter yielded less HPN (10-MV CONV −17.2%; 10-MV SIB −22.5%). The SIB decreased DOOF likewise by 39% for all given scenarios, while the FFF mode reduced DOOF on average by 60%. A strong Pearson correlation was found between MU and HPN (r > 0.9) as well as DOOF (0.7 < r < 0.9).

For a complete treatment, SIB reduces both photoneutron and OOF doses to almost the same extent as FFF deliveries. It is recommended to apply moderately hypofractionated 6‑MV SIB FFF-VMAT when considering photoneutron or OOF doses.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MONDO:0005159)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** PCA (MESH:D011471)
- **Chemicals:** CONV (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10876496/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10876496/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10876496/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10876496