Assessment of organ doses, peak skin doses and effective doses in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion utilising VirtualDose-IR software
Vasileios Metaxas, Christos Dimitroukas, Fotios Efthymiou, Harry Delis, George Gatzounis, Fotios Tzortzidis, Petros Zampakis, Andreas Theofanopoulos, Constantine Constantoyannis, George Panayiotakis

TL;DR
This study evaluates radiation doses in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery using a specific software tool to assess how different factors affect organ and skin doses.
Contribution
The study introduces the use of VirtualDose-IR software with adjustable phantoms to assess radiation doses during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Findings
The type of fusion significantly affects effective dose, with C5/C6 and C6/C7 levels resulting in higher doses than C4/C5.
The thyroid, oesophagus, and salivary glands receive the highest radiation doses during the procedure.
Salivary glands absorb higher doses in males, and multi-level fusions increase extrathoracic region doses.
Abstract
In this study, the effect of patient- and procedure-related parameters on organ doses (ODs), peak skin dose (PSD) and effective dose (E) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was evaluated. Patient- and procedure-related parameters, as well as fluoroscopy time, kerma-area product (KAP), cumulative air-kerma (Kair) and incident Kair, were analysed for 50 ACDF procedures performed with a mobile C-arm. These parameters were inserted in VirtualDose-IR software implementing sex-specific and body mass index (BMI)-adjustable anthropomorphic phantoms to calculate OD, PSD and E. The BMI, gender and type of implants did not significantly affect KAP, incident Kair, PSD and E. However, the type of fusion significantly affected the E. The single fusions in C5/C6 resulted in significantly higher KAP, incident Kair and E than C4/C5 levels, while those performed in C6/C7 resulted in…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiation Dose and Imaging · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
