# Association between the surgical approach and prognosis of spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage

## TL;DR

This study found that using the Sylvian fissure approach in surgery for brain hemorrhage may lead to better recovery outcomes than the cortical approach.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that the Sylvian fissure surgical approach improves long-term functional outcomes in patients with deep brain hemorrhage.

## Key findings

- The Sylvian fissure approach was associated with better one-year mRS scores compared to the cortical approach.
- There were no significant differences in rebleeding or three-month mortality between the two surgical approaches.
- Propensity score matching and inverse weighting confirmed the better functional outcomes with the Sylvian fissure approach.

## Abstract

The association between surgical approach and prognosis in patients with spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage is unclear. We aimed to explore the association between surgical approach and prognosis in these patients. A retrospective cohort of 311 patients from 3 centers who were treated with surgery 24 h after ictus was recruited. The surgical procedure involved removing the intracerebral hematoma using an aspirator through either the cortical approach or Sylvian fissure approach, assisted by an endoscope or microscope. The primary outcome was the one-year modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. The association between the surgical approach and the one-year mRS score was explored by using ordinal logistic regression and binary logistic regression. Baseline characteristics were balanced by propensity score matching and inverse propensity score weighting. In the adjusted analysis, compared with the cortex approach group, the Sylvian fissure approach group had better one-year mRS scores when analyzed as an ordinal variable (3.00 [2.00–4.00] vs. 4.00 [3.00–5.00]; adjusted odds ratio, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.78–5.58; p < 0.001) and a dichotomous variable (74.14% vs. 49.01%; adjusted odds ratio, 6.61; 95% CI, 2.75–15.88; p < 0.001). Surgical approach was not significantly associated with rebleeding (p = 0.88) or three-month mortality (p = 0.81). In univariate analysis after propensity score matching, there were significant differences in one-year mRS score between the two groups (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in rebleeding (Fisher’s exact test, p > 0.999) or three-month mortality (Fisher's exact test, p > 0.999). Inverse probability weighted regression analysis showed better one-year mRS scores when analyzed as an ordinal variable (adjusted odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.17–4.17; p < 0.001) and a dichotomous variable (adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.16–4.77; p < 0.001) in the Sylvian fissure approach group; the surgical approach was not significantly associated with rebleeding (p = 0.50) or three-month mortality (p = 0.60). In the surgical treatment of patients with spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage, the Sylvian fissure approach may lead to a better functional outcome compared with the cortex approach. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm this finding.