Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Recovery With Ambulatory Serratus Plane Catheter After Mastectomy: A Service Evaluation

TL;DR

A new method called ASPIP helps reduce pain and opioid use after mastectomy, leading to better recovery and higher patient satisfaction.

Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates the effectiveness of ambulatory serratus plane catheter (ASPIP) for post-mastectomy pain management.

Findings

ASPIP significantly reduced postoperative pain and opioid use in mastectomy patients.

Patients reported high satisfaction and recommended ASPIP to others.

The day-case rate for mastectomy increased with ASPIP use.

Abstract

Background

Acute moderate to severe pain after mastectomy is common and impedes patient recovery. Ambulatory serratus plane catheter with infusion pump (ASPIP) is a novel method to provide continuous delivery of local anaesthetic agents in the immediate postoperative period for extended analgesia, early mobility, and return to function after mastectomy. The aim of this project was to evaluate the introduction of ASPIP service and its effect on postoperative pain, opioid use, hospital stay, and recovery.

Methods

This was a service evaluation project. Eligible mastectomy patients were included over six months. All patients provided consent for intraoperative catheter insertion and ASPIP use. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) tool were used to assess postoperative pain and the quality of recovery, respectively. Overall satisfaction, sleep quality, and recommendations for the catheter were collected. Day-case rates of mastectomy with or without reconstruction were also measured. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. Mean (SD) and median (quartiles) were used for the continuous variables with percentages to report rates. Approval of the institution's Audit & Quality Improvement Department was obtained.

Results

Thirty-two consecutive mastectomy patients were included over six months. The mean age was 60 years and the mean BMI was 25.8. Mean pain NRS (10 maximum) at rest and on movement were 1.88 vs. 2.56, 2.03 vs. 2.84, and 1.85 vs. 2.3 out of 10 on postoperative day (POD) one, two, and three, respectively. Six patients required opioids on POD one, four patients on POD two, and none on the third day. Sleep disturbance was observed in three, five, and three patients in the first three days, respectively. The mean overall satisfaction was 9.25/10 (SD: 1.18). All patients recommended ASPIP to other patients. QoR-15 scores reported as median (quartiles) were 143 (136, 147) preoperatively and 135 (126.5, 143) postoperatively, with a median difference of -3 (95% CI: -6 to 0). The day-case rate for mastectomy +/- reconstruction was 66% and 39%, respectively. There were no major complications from the catheter with minor issues in four patients.

Conclusion

The ASPIP is an effective and safe method of managing postoperative pain after mastectomy with positive patient experience and reduced opioid requirement. As part of an enhanced recovery pathway, it can also increase mastectomy day-case rates, including immediate implant reconstruction.

Figures