Unusual visual impairment after enhancement refractive surgery
Xia Li, Yong Gu

TL;DR
A patient experienced rapid vision loss after enhancement eye surgery due to corneal epithelial in-growth, which was successfully treated.
Contribution
Identifies a rare but rapid-onset complication of enhancement refractive surgery and highlights diagnostic methods.
Findings
Visual acuity deteriorated rapidly within days after enhancement surgery.
Corneal epithelial in-growth was diagnosed using corneal topography and OCT.
Scraping ectopic epithelial cells restored corneal transparency and improved vision.
Abstract
We reported a case of rapidly developed corneal epithelial in-growth (EI) deteriorating visual acuity (VA) within the initial postoperative day. A 37-year-old male presented with decreased VA for 2 years. He underwent LASIK surgery 13 years ago. After enhancement surgery, postoperative VA was much worse than preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/20 and decreased rapidly. VA of OD was 20/40 on Day 1, and 20/70 on Day 5, OS 20/20 on Day 1, 20/25 on Day 10, and 20/50 on Day 13 postoperatively. Corneal topography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed distinctive features. The patient was diagnosed with corneal EI postoperatively. After scraping ectopic corneal epithelial cells, the cornea became transparent and VA improved. Despite its rarity, early postoperative EI can occur within 1 day after enhancement surgery and can progress rapidly. OCT and corneal topography…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4- —Aier Eye Hospital Group Scientifc Research Center
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCorneal surgery and disorders · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Corneal Surgery and Treatments
Introduction
Corneal epithelial in-growth (EI) is extremely uncommon in the immediate postoperative period. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of EI occurring on the first day after surgery causing a significant decrease in visual acuity (VA).
Case report
A 37-year-old male presented with decreased VA for 2 years. He had undergone LASIK surgery 13 years ago. His uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA) was right eye (OD) 20/100, and 20/100 left eye (OS), improving to 20/20 with a refractive correction of OD -4.00DS, and OS -5.00DS/−0.75DCx10°. The patient underwent uneventful flap-lift enhancement surgery. After enhancement surgery, postoperative VA was much worse than preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/20 and decreased rapidly. One day postoperatively, VA was 20/40 OD with a refractive correction −0.50DS/−0.50 DC → 0.7. VA was 20/20 OS. Intraocular pressure by non-contact tonometry was 11 mmHg OD, 11 mmHg OS.
The lower part of the flap appeared grayish-white from Day 1.On AS-OCT, the lesion extent was 1.1 mm from the edge (Fig. 1) with reflectivity becoming higher. It was deemed as corneal edema and postoperative immunological response. The patient was prescribed fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops and 0.3% Ofloxacin eye drops for both eyes and asked to return in 5 days for reevaluation.
AS-OCT signs for the right eye on the first postoperative day.
The VA in the right eye decreased to 20/70 on Day 5. On slit-lamp examination, interface lesions resembling water or oil stains were present at the lower flap edge. On corneal topography, the anterior elevation of the nasal inferior quadrant increased over time with thickening in the same area. The irregular oblique astigmatism was 0.6 D on Day 1, 2.0 D on Day 5 (Fig. 2).
Corneal topography after enhancement surgery: (A) first postoperative day; (B) fifth postoperative day.
The VA in the patient’s left eye exhibited a marked decrease, from an initial measurement of 20/25 on Day 12, to 20/50 just a day later. Concurrently, the VA in the right eye remained 20/70 on Day 13. Distinct interface lesions were observed in the nasal inferior quadrant of both eyes, spreading radially toward the pupil and originating at the lower edge of the corneal flap. This pattern was consistently observed over the 13-day monitoring period for both eyes (Fig. 3). On AS-OCT, the lesions were seen to enlarge in extent, elongating up to 2.32 mm toward the pupil by Day 13, exhibiting a higher level of reflectivity (Fig. 4).
Slit-lamp photography of the lesions on the 13th postoperative day: (A) right eye; (B) left eye.
(A) AS-OCT signs for the right eye on the fifth day; (B) a detailed shot of the nasal inferior quadrant region.
Reflecting on the enhancement surgery process, the corneal flap was found to be relatively thick and somewhat challenging to fold. The flap thickness was 257 um OD and 265 um OS on AS-OCT. The epithelial cells displayed a looser connection with the membrane layer.
With distinctive features and onset progression, the patient was diagnosed with corneal EI and loose epithelial tissue was noted to be inserted into the interface during surgery for the right eye. A surgical scraping procedure was performed on Day 13 (Video S1, Supplementary Data). A thick epithelial sheet was found spreading from the flap edge. The patient was satisfied with clear vision of 20/25 OU on the first postoperative day. The cornea became transparent.
Discussion
Corneal EI is extremely uncommon in the immediate postoperative period. Upon thorough literature review, no patients presented with severe EI on the first postoperative day. This added difficulties to diagnosis in the first few days. Christopher J [1] reported 46 patients (55 eyes) out of 305 undergoing LASIK developed EI, with onset intervals 0.5–108 months post-surgery. The EI was primarily peripheral in 49 eyes (89%) and central in 6 eyes (11%). Thirty-five eyes (64%) generally showed mild EI (<1 mm from the flap edge). The epithelial cells grew slowly over time.
The clinical manifestations where inserted epithelial followed the rapidly growing cells were totally different from the common EI. During surgery, the epithelial layer was loose and partly dissected from the basement membrane. The entire epithelial layer was inserted into the interface through the incision. The driving force for growth stemmed from limbal stem cells, with a growth rate approximating that of normal epithelial cells.
The thickness of the entire epithelial cell layer changed corneal shape and regularity, interfering with VA in the early postoperative stage and unable to be corrected with spectacles.
The inserted corneal epithelial layer interfered with corneal incision healing. From the flap lift scraping procedure (Video S1), the incision didn’t heal normally and was easily separated.
Anterior basement membrane dystrophy (ABMD) was a risk factor for the EI. Of patients with ABMD, 25.7% had some degree of EI in primary cases [2]. In normal patient population, EI incidence was 0% [3] to 2% [4] in primary cases and 32% in flap lift enhancements [5]. This loose epithelium could reattach or slough off. If sloughing occurred, it could lead to flap edema, causing elevation of the flap margin and opening up a potential space within the interface for epithelial cell migration from the flap perimeter. As a result, these patients faced an elevated risk of EI [6, 7].
A thin flap was previously identified as a risk factor for EI [8]. However, the flap in this case was unusually thick, exceeding 250 um in both eyes. Given the thickness of the flap, why did EI occur in this case? When the flap thickness was within normal range, EI was more likely to occur in eyes with thinner flaps (126.0 ± 29.1 um) compared with eyes with thicker flaps (133.8 ± 27.3 um) [4]. In cases with extremely thick flaps, like this case, the flap may be less elastic and more difficult to achieve optimal incision apposition. This irregularity could promote EI.
It was rare for the epithelial layer to insert into the interface during surgery and it took several days to make the EI diagnosis. Two factors likely contributed to epithelial cell insertion in this case: loose epithelial cells; and an irregular incision due to the thick flap. The inserted full-thickness epithelial layer grew rapidly, interfering the VA seriously. On Day 13, the definitive diagnosis was made and the scraping procedure was performed. The in-growth epithelial cells were completely removed as well as the epithelial cells 1–2 mm outside the incision. There was no EI recurrence and the VA kept normal and steady after the procedure.
Supplementary Material
Video1_rjae074Click here for additional data file.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Rapuano Christopher J . Management of epithelial in-growth after laser in situ keratomileusis on a tertiary care cornea service. Cornea 2010;29:307–13.20098302 10.1097/ICO.0b 013e 3181 b 7f 3c 5 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Rezende Renata A , Uchoa Uchoandro C, Cohen Elisabeth J, et al. Complications associated with anterior basement membrane dystrophy after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2328–31.15519083 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.081 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Walker MB , Wilson SE. Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2000;19:170–3.10746448 10.1097/00003226-200003000-00009 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Asano-Kato N , Toda I, Hori-Komai Y, et al. Epithelial in-growth after laser in situ keratomileusis: clinical features and possible mechanisms. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:801–7.12470746 10.1016/s 0002-9394(02)01757-9 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Pérez-Santonja JJ , Ayala MJ, Sakla HF, et al. Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 1999;106:21–8.9917776 10.1016/S 0161-6420(99)90001-5 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Wang MY , Maloney RK. Epithelial in-growth after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:746–51.10926983 10.1016/s 0002-9394(00)00357-3 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Domniz Y , Comaish IF, Lawless MA, et al. Epithelialin-growth: causes, prevention, and treatment in 5 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1803–11.11709255 10.1016/s 0886-3350(01)01080-x · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Salomon E , Viet B, Lev G, et al. Safety and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic correction performed under thin flaps. Can J Ophthalmol 2007;42:592–9.17641703 · pubmed ↗
