Correction: Absolute and relative GFR and contrast medium dose/GFR ratio: cornerstones when predicting the risk of acute kidney injury
Ulf Nyman, Peter Leander, Per Liss, Gunnar Sterner, Torkel Brismar
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Kidney Injury Research · Radiation Dose and Imaging
Correction: European Radiology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09962-w
The original version of this article, published on 4 August 2023, unfortunately contained some mistakes. First of all, Fig. 2B has been replaced by an updated version. Additionally, the ratio in the following phrase “it results in a relatively high ratio (1.11) and thus a greater CI-AKI risk” in the caption of Table 2 has been corrected to (1.00). Finally, the following information has been added to the Acknowledgements section: "All authors are members of the Contrast Media Committee of the Swedish Society of Uroradiology (PLe chairman, PLi head of iodine contrast media group),
TB is a member of the Contrast Media Committee of the European Society of Urogenitalradiology
GS member of the Swedish Society of Nephrology
UN is a member of European Kidney Function Consortium, which is endorsed by the European Renal Association". The original article has been corrected.