# Anastrozole for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK and the USA

**Authors:** XiaoXia Wei, Jiaqin Cai, Huiting Lin, Wenhua Wu, Jie Zhuang, Hong Sun

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10658-0 · BMC Health Services Research · 2024-02-13

## TL;DR

This study evaluates whether anastrozole is a cost-effective option for preventing breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women in the UK and the US.

## Contribution

The study introduces a decision-analytic model to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women.

## Key findings

- In the UK, anastrozole becomes cost-effective after 12 years with an ICER of £8,313.45/QALY.
- In the US, anastrozole is cost-effective in both 5- and 12-year timeframes, with ICERs below the WTP threshold.
- Longer treatment duration increases the cost-effectiveness acceptability of anastrozole.

## Abstract

The effectiveness of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention has been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole for the prevention of breast cancer in women with a high risk of breast cancer and to determine whether anastrozole for the primary prevention of breast cancer can improve the quality of life of women and save health-care resources.

A decision-analytic model was used to assess the costs and effects of anastrozole prevention versus no prevention among women with a high risk of breast cancer. The key parameters of probability were derived from the IBIS-II trial, and the cost and health outcome data were derived from published literature. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for the two strategies,One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

In the base case, the incremental cost per QALY of anastrozole prevention was £125,705.38/QALY in the first 5 years compared with no prevention in the UK, above the threshold of WTP (£3,000/QALY),and in the 12-year period, the ICER was £8,313.45/QALY, less than WTP. For the US third-party payer, ICER was $134,232.13/QALY in the first 5 years and $8,843.30/QALY in the 12 years, both less than the WTP threshold ($150,000/QALY).

In the UK and US, anastrozole may be a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Moreover, the longer the cycle of the model, the higher the acceptability. The results of this study may provide a scientific reference for decision-making for clinicians, patients, and national medical and health care government departments.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** anastrozole (PubChem CID 2187)
- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MESH:D001943)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10865705/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10865705/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10865705/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10865705