This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
Retraction: SALL4 as an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Drug Resistance Inducer through the Regulation of c-Myc in Endometrial Cancer

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRenal and related cancers · Neonatal Respiratory Health Research · Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Following publication of this article [1] concerns were raised regarding Figs 1, 2, and 5. Specifically,
The corresponding author stated that the majority of underlying data for this article are no longer available, but they provided blot images in support of results shown in Fig 1 and Fig 2, replacement panels for Fig 2B and 2E, and replication data in support of Fig 5F. Regarding the concerns in Figure 2B and Fig 2E, the corresponding author stated that errors were made during figure preparation.
Whilst the blot data provided for Fig 1A did resolve the concerns regarding the apparent vertical discontinuity, the images provided for the remaining western blot data in Figs 1 and 2 raised additional questions regarding the underlying data pertaining to this article.
Additionally, while the replacement images for Fig 2 provided post-publication lend support for the reported findings, the PLOS ONE Editors remain concerned about the extent of figure concerns in this article, the unavailability of the original underlying data, and the implications of these issues for the overall reliability of data reporting. Therefore, the PLOS ONE Editors retract this article.
XX did not agree with the retraction. LL, JZ, XY, CF and HX either did not respond directly or could not be reached.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
