# Should Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Be Replaced With Combined Blood-Borne Virus Testing?

**Authors:** Chloe Orkin

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad668 · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · 2024-01-11

## TL;DR

The paper argues that standalone HIV testing misses other blood-borne viruses, suggesting combined testing is more effective.

## Contribution

The paper highlights new evidence showing combined blood-borne virus testing improves detection beyond standalone HIV testing.

## Key findings

- Eight cases of viral hepatitis are missed for each new HIV diagnosis with standalone testing.
- A decade of research supports the added benefit of combined blood-borne virus testing.

## Abstract

Standalone HIV testing is a missed opportunity- a recent systematic review showed eight cases of viral hepatitis would be missed for each new HIV diagnosis. The review builds on a decade of research demonstrating the additional benefit of BBV testing.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** viral hepatitis (MONDO:0006011)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** viral hepatitis (MESH:D014777)
- **Species:** Human immunodeficiency virus (species) [taxon 12721], Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (no rank) [taxon 11676]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10863545/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10863545/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10863545