The court’s judgment on the true identity of the author responsible for identity fraud and the consequent batch retraction of Iranian’s papers in the journal of diagnostic pathology
Aram Mokarizadeh

TL;DR
A court in Iran investigated and retracted a batch of fraudulent papers after an author's identity was misused without consent.
Contribution
The paper presents a legal and ethical case of academic misconduct and its resolution through judicial action.
Findings
The submitting author was convicted for identity fraud and data forgery.
The court confirmed the misuse of the author's name in submitted manuscripts.
The Cyber Police investigation revealed the true identity of the fraudulent author.
Abstract
This letter concerns retracted papers published in the Journal of Diagnostic Pathology, where my name was misused as the author or corresponding author without my permission or knowledge. Considering that all misconducts were directed by an author during initial manuscripts’ submissions, I opened a case in Iran’s Cyber Police (FATA) to unravel the true identity of the submitting author. After Cyber Police’s report revealed the true identity of the submitting author, the court started a thorough investigation and finally convicted the submitting author for identity fraud and data forgery through creating and using fake email addresses.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcademic integrity and plagiarism
