MR imaging-based risk stratification scoring system to predict clinical outcomes in carotid body tumors
Abhishek Mahajan, Atif Shaikh, Shreya Shukla, Richa Vaish, Ujjwal Agarwal, Vasundhara Smriti, Shivam Rastogi, Shonal Deokar, Shubham Suryavanshi, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Kumar Prabhash, Vijay Patil, Vanita Noronha, Nandini Menon, Prathamesh Pai, Gouri Pantvaidya

TL;DR
This study proposes a new MRI-based scoring system to predict surgical risks in carotid body tumors, offering an alternative to existing classifications.
Contribution
The Mahajan classification system is introduced as an imaging-based method for preoperative risk stratification in carotid body tumors.
Findings
The Mahajan classification divides tumors into four grades based on MRI characteristics.
High-risk tumors showed increased likelihood of vascular and cranial nerve injuries during surgery.
The proposed system outperforms Shamblin’s classification in predicting surgical outcomes.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the role of pretherapy MRI in predicting outcomes in carotid body tumors and propose a grading system for high- and low-risk characteristics. A retrospective observational study of 44 patients with 51 lesions was carried out from year 2005 to 2020. MR images were reviewed for characteristics of carotid body tumor, and a score was given that was correlated with intra- and postoperative findings. The various other classifications and our proposed Mahajan classification were compared with Shamblin’s classification. The area under the curve and ROC curves were used to present the accuracy of different predictive models. Our scoring system allotted a score of 0 to 15 on the basis of MRI characteristics, with scores calculated for patients in our study ranging from 0 to 13. Lesions with scores of 0–6 were considered low risk (45%), and scores of 7–15 were…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational Practices and Policies · Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation · Social Sciences and Policies
