Editorial: Genetic research into neurodegenerative disorders
Xiaoting Zheng, Jianhai Chen, Chunyu Li

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMitochondrial Function and Pathology · Biotin and Related Studies · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
The integration of advanced sequencing technologies into genetic research has ushered in a new era of understanding the intricate genetic foundations of neurodegenerative disorders. This transformative approach has yielded a wealth of insights, emphasizing the pivotal role played by genetic factors in susceptibility to conditions such as Parkinson's disease (PD), hereditary spastic paraplegia, and Alzheimer's disease (AD).
In a study on PD, Liu et al. utilized burden genetic analysis combined with high-throughput sequencing to evaluate Dynamin-1-like (DNM1L) variants in the Chinese population. They identified 23 rare variants and 201 common variants in the DNM1L coding region but found no significant relationship with PD susceptibility, thereby broadening the genetic spectrum of the DNM1L gene in PD. The results not only expanded our knowledge of the genetic diversity within the DNM1L gene, but also significantly advanced our understanding of its implications for PD susceptibility.
Similarly, Ferese et al.'s investigation into hereditary spastic paraplegia type 4 (SPG4) patients with SPAST gene mutations has employed next-generation sequencing panels to uncover a rich tapestry of splice variants. The combined approach of in silico and in vitro analysis for splicing mutations confirmed the pathogenic mechanism of two splicing variants (i.e., c.1245+1G>A and c.1414-2A>T).
In the context of AD, Wang et al.'s innovative use of optimized transcriptome-wide association studies has not only expanded our knowledge base with the identification of 415 associated risk genes but has also led to the validation of 34 highly reliable biomarkers, including APOC1, CR1, ERBB2, and RIN3. This not only corroborates existing knowledge but also illuminates novel avenues for deeper exploration into AD pathogenesis.
Furthermore, Cox et al. described the clinical spectrum of mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS), encompassing both patients and asymptomatic carriers. They observed varying heterogeneity levels in different tissues and found distinct manifestations in standard and late-onset cases with similar or divergent genetic mutations.
Collectively, these multifaceted investigations underscore the intricate interplay of genetic factors in neurodegenerative disorders, urging the scientific community to embark on further explorations to uncover novel risk variants, elucidate underlying mechanisms, and delineate intricate pathways. Such analyses are essential for advancing our knowledge and developing targeted interventions for these complex and challenging conditions.
Author contributions
XZ: Writing—original draft. JC: Writing—review & editing. CL: Writing—review & editing.
