Author Correction: Photodynamic reactions using high-intensity red LED promotes gingival wound healing by ROS induction
Emika Minagawa, Nobuhiro Yamauchi, Yoichiro Taguchi, Makoto Umeda

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Medical and Biological Ozone Research
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-023-43966-2, published online 10 October 2023
The original version of this Article contained errors, Reference 7 and 30 were interchanged. The correct Reference 7 and 30 are listed below:
-
Heiskanen, V., Hamblin, MR. Photobiomopdulation: Lasers vs Light Emitting Diodes?. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 17, 1003–1017 (2018).
-
Tardivo, J, P. et al. Methylene blue in photodynamic therapy: From basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2, 175–91 (2005).
Also, Reference 7 was incorrectly cited as Reference 30 in the sentence:
The light used in this study had a lower energy fluence rate than the laser. Although the difference between the effects of lasers and LED, which have different energy fluence rates, on cells, continues to be debated, the possibility of replacing lasers with LED without worsening the results has been suggested^30^.
it now reads:
The light used in this study had a lower energy fluence rate than the laser. Although the difference between the effects of lasers and LED, which have different energy fluence rates, on cells, continues to be debated, the possibility of replacing lasers with LED without worsening the results has been suggested^7^.
Also, Reference 13 was incorrectly cited as Reference 12 in the sentence:
“It is also utilized to kill periodontal pathogens in the treatment of periodontal disease^12^ and has garnered attention owing to the risk of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents and safety in patients with systemic disease.”
it now reads:
“It is also utilized to kill periodontal pathogens in the treatment of periodontal disease^13^ and has garnered attention owing to the risk of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents and safety in patients with systemic disease.”
As a result, the subsequent References have been renumbered.
The original Article has been corrected.
