# Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Bolus Regimens During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: An Observational Study to Assess Hemodynamic Changes

## TL;DR

This study compares two ways of giving phenylephrine during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia to see which better maintains blood pressure without side effects.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence comparing phenylephrine infusion versus bolus administration for hemodynamic stability during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

## Key findings

- The bolus group had better systolic blood pressure maintenance compared to baseline.
- Neither group experienced nausea or vomiting, and APGAR scores were similar.
- Heart rate changes were not significantly different between the two groups.

## Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two modes of phenylephrine administration, namely continuous infusion and intermittent bolus, in maintaining maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia (SA).

Methods

Eighty patients undergoing cesarean delivery with SA were allocated into two groups. In group I, 40 patients were administered a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion at a rate of 75 mcg/min immediately after SA. Conversely, group B, consisting of 40 patients, received a 75 mcg bolus dose promptly after SA and subsequently whenever their blood pressure fell by more than 20% from the baseline value. Crucial variables, such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and side effects, were closely monitored at a three-minute interval in both groups. Following the delivery of the child, APGAR scores were documented at the first and fifth minutes, and the gathered data underwent analysis using SPSS Statistics, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

The results revealed that baseline HR and blood pressure were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, the bolus group exhibited a higher mean HR, whereas the infusion group maintained a closer proximity to the baseline reading throughout the measurement period. Despite these variations, changes in HR did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the two groups at any measuring intervals. Additionally, the mean systolic blood pressure in group B exhibited an initial decrease from the baseline, whereas group I displayed an increase compared to the baseline values. Importantly, neither group reported instances of nausea or vomiting, and the APGAR scores were comparable between them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study found that a phenylephrine bolus of 75 mcg was more effective in maintaining blood pressure within acceptable limits without causing bradycardia or hypertension when compared to a phenylephrine infusion.