Balancing Open-Mindedness and Sound-Mindedness: A Physician’s Perspective
Kalimullah Jan

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of balancing open-mindedness and sound-mindedness in medical decision-making to avoid errors and ambiguity.
Contribution
The paper introduces a physician's perspective on integrating open-mindedness and sound-mindedness in clinical contexts.
Findings
Open-mindedness can prevent mistakes but may lead to ambiguity if overused.
Sound-mindedness relies on logic and evidence, offering a balanced approach to problem-solving.
Both traits are complementary and should be cultivated by medical professionals.
Abstract
Open-mindedness in the medical decision-making process is fundamental as it aids in averting mistakes, yet it can also breed ambiguity if it’s too excessive. On the other hand, sound-mindedness, which is a balanced method that employs logic and evidence in problem-solving, could be the preferred approach. Both these traits have their limitations, yet they can supplement each other in various clinical contexts. Therefore, it’s crucial for medical professionals to wisely cultivate and uphold both these traits.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Innovations in Medical Education · Empathy and Medical Education
