Corrigendum: Endometrial microbiota profile in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients by culturomics-based analysis
Federica Cariati, Consolata Carotenuto, Francesca Bagnulo, Daniela Pacella, Vincenzo Marrone, Rossella Paolillo, Maria Rosaria Catania, Raffaella Di Girolamo, Alessandro Conforti, Ida Strina, Carlo Alviggi
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive System and Pregnancy · Ovarian function and disorders · Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Text Correction
In the published article, there was an error. In methods section of the abstract, an incorrect study period was indicated. However, the correct one was already reported in the in main body of the manuscript (Material and methods section).
A correction has been made to abstract, methods. This sentence previously stated: “A prospective cohort study was performed at the University of Naples from June 2022 to December 2022”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“A prospective cohort study was performed at the University of Naples from October 2022 and February 2023”.
Error in Figure/Table
In the published article, Figure 2 and Table 5 reported errors. In details, in Figure 2A a color label association error was made. Table 5 showed an error in data on Firmicutes/Lactobacillaceae presented as absolute value and not as a percentage. The corrected Figure 2 and Table 5 and its caption appear below.
Error in Table Legend
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 5 as published.
The legend “ Comparison between Group A (pregnant patients) and Group B (no pregnant patients)” does not properly match the contents.
The corrected legend appears below:
Comparison between Group A (pregnant patients) and Group B (no pregnant patients). Data are presented as relative prevalence among the families of the phylum (%). *Relative prevalence with respect to the distribution of the Phylum.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.